Alvarado Juan Carlos, Rowland Benjamin A, Stanford Terrence R, Stein Barry E
Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Brain Res. 2008 Nov 25;1242:13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.074. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
Sensory integration is a characteristic feature of superior colliculus (SC) neurons. A recent neural network model of single-neuron integration derived a set of basic biological constraints sufficient to replicate a number of physiological findings pertaining to multisensory responses. The present study examined the accuracy of this model in predicting the responses of SC neurons to pairs of visual stimuli placed within their receptive fields. The accuracy of this model was compared to that of three other computational models (additive, averaging and maximum operator) previously used to fit these data. Each neuron's behavior was assessed by examining its mean responses to the component stimuli individually and together, and each model's performance was assessed to determine how close its prediction came to the actual mean response of each neuron and the magnitude of its predicted residual error. Predictions from the additive model significantly overshot the actual responses of SC neurons and predictions from the averaging model significantly undershot them. Only the predictions of the maximum operator and neural network model were not significantly different from the actual responses. However, the neural network model outperformed even the maximum operator model in predicting the responses of these neurons. The neural network model is derived from a larger model that also has substantial predictive power in multisensory integration, and provides a single computational vehicle for assessing the responses of SC neurons to different combinations of cross-modal and within-modal stimuli of different efficacies.
感觉整合是上丘(SC)神经元的一个特征。最近一个关于单神经元整合的神经网络模型得出了一组基本生物学约束条件,足以复制许多与多感觉反应相关的生理学发现。本研究检验了该模型在预测SC神经元对置于其感受野内的视觉刺激对的反应时的准确性。将该模型的准确性与之前用于拟合这些数据的其他三个计算模型(加法模型、平均模型和最大算子模型)的准确性进行了比较。通过分别检查每个神经元对成分刺激单独和共同的平均反应来评估每个神经元的行为,并评估每个模型的性能,以确定其预测与每个神经元的实际平均反应的接近程度以及其预测残差误差的大小。加法模型的预测显著高估了SC神经元的实际反应,平均模型的预测则显著低估了它们。只有最大算子模型和神经网络模型的预测与实际反应没有显著差异。然而,在预测这些神经元的反应方面,神经网络模型甚至优于最大算子模型。神经网络模型源自一个更大的模型,该模型在多感觉整合方面也具有强大的预测能力,并为评估SC神经元对不同功效的跨模态和模态内刺激的不同组合的反应提供了一个单一的计算工具。