Cowley Patrick M, Clark Brian C, Ploutz-Snyder Lori L
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science at Syracuse University, 201 Women's Building, 820 Comstock Ave, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Musculoskeletal Research Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science at Syracuse University, 201 Women's Building, 820 Comstock Ave, Syracuse, NY 13244, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Aug;119(8):1849-1856. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.04.004. Epub 2008 May 16.
Data on whether motor imagery (MI) modulates spinal excitability are equivocal. The purpose of this study was to determine if imagined muscle contractions of the left plantar flexor (PF) alter spinal excitability, and if so, to determine whether this alteration is intensity dependent and/or localized to the target muscles. Our research questions required two experiments.
In experiment 1, 16 healthy volunteers performed imagined muscle contractions using a kinesthetic approach with their left PF at 25% and 100% of imagined effort (IE). The soleus H-reflex was evoked during three conditions, which were separated by about 15s: rest (preceding MI), during MI, and recovery (following the cessation of MI). In experiment 2, a subset of subjects from experiment 1 performed MI with their left PF at 100% of IE, while either the soleus or flexor carpi radialis (FCR) H-reflex was measured.
In experiment 1, we observed a facilitation of soleus H-wave amplitude during MI compared to the rest and recovery conditions (p<0.05). Furthermore, the soleus H-wave amplitude was greater during 100% than 25% of IE (p<0.05). In experiment 2, soleus and FCR H-wave amplitude increased during imagined muscle contractions of the left PF (p<0.05). These changes were independent of voluntary muscle activity.
These findings suggest MI can increase spinal excitability by the intensity of imagined effort, but this effect is not fully localized to the task specific muscle.
These data provide evidence that MI can increase spinal excitability in healthy subjects, which suggests future studies are warranted to examine the clinical relevance of this effect. These studies are needed to help establish a therapeutic theory by which to advance motor function rehabilitation using MI.
关于运动想象(MI)是否调节脊髓兴奋性的数据并不明确。本研究的目的是确定左足底屈肌(PF)的想象肌肉收缩是否会改变脊髓兴奋性,如果是,则确定这种改变是否依赖于强度以及是否局限于目标肌肉。我们的研究问题需要两个实验。
在实验1中,16名健康志愿者采用动觉方法对其左PF进行想象肌肉收缩,想象努力程度(IE)分别为25%和100%。在三种情况下诱发比目鱼肌H反射,这三种情况间隔约15秒:休息(运动想象之前)、运动想象期间和恢复(运动想象停止之后)。在实验2中,实验1的一部分受试者对其左PF进行100% IE的运动想象,同时测量比目鱼肌或桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)的H反射。
在实验1中,我们观察到与休息和恢复情况相比,运动想象期间比目鱼肌H波幅有促进作用(p<0.05)。此外,100% IE时比目鱼肌H波幅大于25% IE时(p<0.05)。在实验2中,左PF想象肌肉收缩期间比目鱼肌和FCR的H波幅增加(p<0.05)。这些变化与随意肌肉活动无关。
这些发现表明运动想象可通过想象努力程度增加脊髓兴奋性,但这种效应并不完全局限于任务特定肌肉。
这些数据提供了证据表明运动想象可增加健康受试者的脊髓兴奋性,这表明未来有必要进行研究以检验这种效应的临床相关性。需要这些研究来帮助建立一种治疗理论,以便利用运动想象推进运动功能康复。