Suppr超能文献

次最大强度的神经肌肉电刺激联合运动想象可增加皮质脊髓兴奋性。

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation at submaximal intensity combined with motor imagery increases corticospinal excitability.

作者信息

Eon Pauline, Grosprêtre Sidney, Martin Alain

机构信息

Laboratory Culture Sport Health Society (C3S-UR 4660), Sport and Performance Department, University of Franche-Comté, UFR STAPS, 31 Chemin de L'Epitaphe, 25000, Besançon, France.

Institut Universitaire de France (IUF), Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Feb;125(2):561-572. doi: 10.1007/s00421-024-05615-y. Epub 2024 Oct 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is sparse evidence in the literature that the combination of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and motor imagery (MI) can increase corticospinal excitability more that the application of one or the other modality alone. However, the NMES intensity usually employed was below or at motor threshold, not allowing a proper activation of the whole neuromuscular system. This questions the effect of combined MI + NMES with higher intensities, closer to those used in clinical settings. The purpose here was to assess corticospinal excitability during either MI, NMES or a combination of both at different evoked forces.

METHODS

Seventeen healthy participants were enrolled in one session consisting of 6 conditions targeting flexor carpi radialis muscle (FCR): rest, MI, NMES at 5% and 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and MI and NMES performed simultaneously (MI + NMES). During each condition, corticospinal excitability was assessed by evoking MEP of FCR by using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Maximal M-wave (Mmax) was measured by using the stimulation of the median nerve.

RESULTS

MEPs during MI were greater as compared to rest (P = 0.005). MEPs during MI were significantly lower than during MI + NMES at 5% (P = 0.02) and 20% (P = 0.001). Then, MEPs during NMES 5% was significantly lower than during MI + NMES 20% (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that MI + NMES increased corticospinal excitability more than MI alone. However, corticospinal excitability was not higher as the intensity increase during MI + NMES. Therefore, MI + NMES targeting FCR may not significantly increase the corticospinal excitability between different low-submaximal contractions intensities.

摘要

目的

文献中关于神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)与运动想象(MI)相结合比单独应用其中一种方式更能增加皮质脊髓兴奋性的证据较少。然而,通常采用的NMES强度低于或处于运动阈值,无法充分激活整个神经肌肉系统。这就对更高强度(更接近临床应用强度)的MI + NMES联合疗法的效果提出了质疑。本研究旨在评估在不同诱发力量下,单独进行MI、NMES或两者联合时的皮质脊髓兴奋性。

方法

17名健康参与者参加了一次包含针对桡侧腕屈肌(FCR)的6种条件的实验:休息、MI、5%最大自主收缩(MVC)和20%最大自主收缩时的NMES,以及同时进行MI和NMES(MI + NMES)。在每种条件下,通过经颅磁刺激诱发FCR的运动诱发电位(MEP)来评估皮质脊髓兴奋性。通过刺激正中神经测量最大M波(Mmax)。

结果

与休息时相比,MI期间的MEP更大(P = 0.005)。MI期间的MEP显著低于5%(P = 0.02)和20%(P = 0.001)最大自主收缩时MI + NMES期间的MEP。然后,5%最大自主收缩时NMES期间的MEP显著低于20%最大自主收缩时MI + NMES期间的MEP(P < 0.005)。

结论

本研究表明,MI + NMES比单独的MI更能增加皮质脊髓兴奋性。然而,在MI + NMES过程中,随着强度增加,皮质脊髓兴奋性并未更高。因此,针对FCR的MI + NMES在不同低次最大收缩强度之间可能不会显著增加皮质脊髓兴奋性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验