Muers Martin F, Stephens Richard J, Fisher Patricia, Darlison Liz, Higgs Christopher M B, Lowry Erica, Nicholson Andrew G, O'Brien Mary, Peake Michael, Rudd Robin, Snee Michael, Steele Jeremy, Girling David J, Nankivell Matthew, Pugh Cheryl, Parmar Mahesh K B
Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Lancet. 2008 May 17;371(9625):1685-94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60727-8.
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is almost always fatal, and few treatment options are available. Although active symptom control (ASC) has been recommended for the management of this disease, no consensus exists for the role of chemotherapy. We investigated whether the addition of chemotherapy to ASC improved survival and quality of life.
409 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, from 76 centres in the UK and two in Australia, were randomly assigned to ASC alone (treatment could include steroids, analgesic drugs, bronchodilators, palliative radiotherapy [n=136]); to ASC plus MVP (four cycles of mitomycin 6 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 3 weeks [n=137]); or to ASC plus vinorelbine (one injection of vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 every week for 12 weeks [n=136]). Randomisation was done by minimisation, with stratification for WHO performance status, histology, and centre. Follow-up was every 3 weeks to 21 weeks after randomisation, and every 8 weeks thereafter. Because of slow accrual, the two chemotherapy groups were combined and compared with ASC alone for the primary outcome of overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered, number ISRCTN54469112.
At the time of analysis, 393 (96%) patients had died (ASC 132 [97%], ASC plus MVP 132 [96%], ASC plus vinorelbine 129 [95%]). Compared with ASC alone, we noted a small, non-significant survival benefit for ASC plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.89 [95% CI 0.72-1.10]; p=0.29). Median survival was 7.6 months in the ASC alone group and 8.5 months in the ASC plus chemotherapy group. Exploratory analyses suggested a survival advantage for ASC plus vinorelbine compared with ASC alone (HR 0.80 [0.63-1.02]; p=0.08), with a median survival of 9.5 months. There was no evidence of a survival benefit with ASC plus MVP (HR 0.99 [0.78-1.27]; p=0.95). We observed no between-group differences in four predefined quality-of-life subscales (physical functioning, pain, dyspnoea, and global health status) at any of the assessments in the first 6 months.
The addition of chemotherapy to ASC offers no significant benefits in terms of overall survival or quality of life. However, exploratory analyses suggested that vinorelbine merits further investigation.
恶性胸膜间皮瘤几乎总是致命的,且治疗选择有限。尽管已推荐积极症状控制(ASC)用于该疾病的管理,但对于化疗的作用尚无共识。我们研究了在ASC基础上加用化疗是否能改善生存和生活质量。
来自英国76个中心和澳大利亚2个中心的409例恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者被随机分配至单纯ASC组(治疗可包括类固醇、镇痛药、支气管扩张剂、姑息性放疗[n = 136]);ASC加MVP组(每3周给予丝裂霉素6 mg/m²、长春花碱6 mg/m²和顺铂50 mg/m²,共4个周期[n = 137]);或ASC加长春瑞滨组(每周注射一次长春瑞滨30 mg/m²,共12周[n = 136])。随机分组采用最小化法,并根据世界卫生组织的体能状态、组织学类型和中心进行分层。随机分组后每3周随访至21周,此后每8周随访一次。由于入组缓慢,将两个化疗组合并,并与单纯ASC组比较总生存这一主要结局。分析采用意向性治疗。本研究已注册,注册号为ISRCTN54469112。
在分析时,393例(96%)患者已死亡(ASC组132例[97%],ASC加MVP组132例[96%],ASC加长春瑞滨组129例[95%])。与单纯ASC组相比,我们注意到ASC加化疗有小的、无统计学意义的生存获益(风险比[HR] 0.89 [95% CI 0.72 - 1.10];p = 0.29)。单纯ASC组的中位生存期为7.6个月,ASC加化疗组为8.5个月。探索性分析提示,与单纯ASC组相比,ASC加长春瑞滨有生存优势(HR 0.80 [0.63 - 1.02];p = 0.08),中位生存期为9.5个月。没有证据表明ASC加MVP有生存获益(HR 0.99 [0.78 - 1.27];p = 0.95)。在前6个月的任何一次评估中,我们未观察到四个预定义生活质量子量表(身体功能、疼痛、呼吸困难和总体健康状况)存在组间差异。
在ASC基础上加用化疗在总生存或生活质量方面无显著益处。然而,探索性分析提示长春瑞滨值得进一步研究。