Aufderheide Tom P, Kudenchuk Peter J, Hedges Jerris R, Nichol Graham, Kerber Richard E, Dorian Paul, Davis Daniel P, Idris Ahamed H, Callaway Clifton W, Emerson Scott, Stiell Ian G, Terndrup Thomas E
Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Resuscitation. 2008 Aug;78(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.01.028. Epub 2008 May 19.
The primary aim of this study is to compare survival to hospital discharge with a modified Rankin score (MRS)< or =3 between standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus an active impedance threshold device (ITD) versus standard CPR plus a sham ITD in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Secondary aims are to compare functional status and depression at discharge and at 3 and 6 months post-discharge in survivors.
Prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trial.
Patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical services (EMS) providers.
EMS systems participating in the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.
Based on a one-sided significance level of 0.025, power=0.90, a survival with MRS< or =3 to discharge rate of 5.33% with standard CPR and sham ITD, and two interim analyses, a maximum of 14,742 evaluable patients are needed to detect a 6.69% survival with MRS< or =3 to discharge with standard CPR and active ITD (1.36% absolute survival difference).
If the ITD demonstrates the hypothesized improvement in survival, it is estimated that 2700 deaths from cardiac arrest per year would be averted in North America alone.
本研究的主要目的是比较院外心脏骤停患者中,标准心肺复苏(CPR)联合主动阻抗阈值装置(ITD)与标准CPR联合假ITD,至出院时改良Rankin量表(MRS)评分≤3的生存率。次要目的是比较幸存者出院时、出院后3个月和6个月时的功能状态及抑郁情况。
前瞻性、双盲、随机、对照临床试验。
由紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员治疗的非创伤性院外心脏骤停患者。
参与复苏结果联盟的EMS系统。
基于单侧显著性水平0.025、检验效能=0.90、标准CPR联合假ITD至出院时MRS评分≤3的生存率为5.33%,以及两次中期分析,最多需要14742例可评估患者,以检测标准CPR联合主动ITD至出院时MRS评分≤3的生存率为6.69%(绝对生存差异为1.36%)。
如果ITD能证明其在生存率方面有假设中的改善,据估计仅在北美每年就能避免2700例心脏骤停死亡。