Shandley Kerrie, Austin David William, Klein Britt, Pier Ciaran, Schattner Peter, Pierce David, Wade Victoria
Swinburne University of Technology, Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Mail H31, PO Box 218, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia.
J Med Internet Res. 2008 May 19;10(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1033.
Mental illness is an escalating concern worldwide. The management of disorders such as anxiety and depression largely falls to family doctors or general practitioners (GPs). However, GPs are often too time constrained and may lack the necessary training to adequately manage the needs of such patients. Evidence-based Internet interventions represent a potentially valuable resource to reduce the burden of care and the cost of managing mental health disorders within primary care settings and, at the same time, improve patient outcomes.
The present study sought to extend the efficacy of a therapist-assisted Internet treatment program for panic disorder, Panic Online, by determining whether comparable outcomes could be achieved and maintained when Panic Online was supported by either GPs or psychologists.
Via a natural groups design, 96 people with a primary diagnosis of panic disorder (with or without agoraphobia) completed the Panic Online program over 12 weeks with the therapeutic assistance of their GP (n = 53), who had received specialist training in cognitive behavioral therapy, or a clinical psychologist (n = 43). Participants completed a clinical diagnostic telephone interview, conducted by a psychologist, and a set of online questionnaires to assess panic-related symptoms at three time periods (pretreatment, posttreatment, and 6 month follow-up).
Both treatments led to clinically significant improvements on measures of panic and panic-related symptomatology from pretreatment to posttreatment. Both groups were shown to significantly improve over time. Improvements for both groups were maintained at follow-up; however, the groups did differ significantly on two quality of life domains: physical (F(1,82) = 9.13, P = .00) and environmental (F(1,82) = 4.41, P = .04). The attrition rate was significantly higher among those being treated by their GP (chi(2) (1) = 4.40, P = .02, N = 96).
This study provides evidence that Internet-based interventions are an effective adjunct to existing mental health care systems. Consequently, this may facilitate and enhance the delivery of evidence-based mental health treatments to increasingly large segments of the population via primary care systems and through suitably trained health professionals.
精神疾病在全球范围内日益受到关注。焦虑和抑郁等疾病的管理主要由家庭医生或全科医生(GP)负责。然而,全科医生往往时间紧迫,可能缺乏充分管理此类患者需求的必要培训。基于证据的互联网干预是一种潜在的宝贵资源,可减轻初级保健环境中护理负担和管理精神健康疾病的成本,同时改善患者预后。
本研究旨在通过确定在全科医生或心理学家支持下开展“在线惊恐症治疗项目”(Panic Online)时能否取得并维持可比的疗效,来扩展该治疗师辅助的互联网惊恐症治疗项目的疗效。
通过自然分组设计,96名初步诊断为惊恐症(伴或不伴有广场恐惧症)的患者在其全科医生(n = 53)或临床心理学家(n = 43)的治疗协助下,在12周内完成了“在线惊恐症治疗项目”。这些全科医生接受过认知行为疗法的专业培训。参与者完成了由一名心理学家进行的临床诊断电话访谈,以及一组在线问卷,以评估三个时间段(治疗前、治疗后和6个月随访)的惊恐相关症状。
从治疗前到治疗后,两种治疗方法在惊恐及惊恐相关症状的测量指标上均带来了具有临床意义的改善。两组均显示随时间显著改善。两组的改善在随访时得以维持;然而,两组在两个生活质量领域存在显著差异:身体领域(F(1,82) = 9.13,P = .00)和环境领域(F(1,82) = 4.41,P = .04)。全科医生治疗组的脱落率显著更高(卡方(2) (1) = 4.40,P = .02,N = 96)。
本研究提供了证据表明基于互联网的干预是现有精神卫生保健系统的有效辅助手段。因此,这可能有助于并加强通过初级保健系统和经过适当培训的卫生专业人员,向越来越多的人群提供基于证据的精神卫生治疗。