Lang Iain A, Llewellyn David J, Langa Kenneth M, Wallace Robert B, Melzer David
Epidemiology and Public Health Group, Peninsula Medical School, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.
Age Ageing. 2008 Jul;37(4):403-10. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn092. Epub 2008 May 16.
to assess whether incident mobility disability and neighbourhood deprivation in older people are associated independent of the effects of individual socio-economic status, health behaviours and health status.
prospective cohort study with a 2-year follow-up.
the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a national probability sample of non-institutionalised older people.
4,148 participants aged 60 years and over.
exposure was a census-based index of neighbourhood deprivation [the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD)]; outcomes were measured and self-reported incident mobility difficulties.
neighbourhood deprivation had a statistically significant effect on physical function following adjustment for individual socio-economic factors, health behaviours and health status. Compared to those living in the least deprived 20% of neighbourhoods, those in the most deprived neighbourhoods had a risk ratio (RR) of incident self-reported mobility difficulties of 1.75 (95% CI 1.14-2.70) and RR of incident-impaired gait speed of 1.63 (95% CI 1.01-2.62). In adjusted models, 4.0 per 100 (95% CI 3.0-5.4) older adults in neighbourhoods in the least deprived 20% had incident mobility difficulties over a 2-year period, whereas 13.6 per 100 (95% CI 10.5-17.4) older adults had incident mobility difficulties in neighbourhoods in the most deprived 20%.
older people living in deprived neighbourhoods are significantly more likely to experience incident mobility difficulties than those in less-deprived neighbourhoods. The mechanisms underlying this relationship are unclear and research to identify mechanisms and appropriate interventions is needed.
评估老年人新发行动能力残疾与邻里贫困之间是否存在关联,且这种关联独立于个体社会经济地位、健康行为和健康状况的影响。
进行为期2年随访的前瞻性队列研究。
英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA),一项针对非机构化老年人的全国概率抽样调查。
4148名60岁及以上的参与者。
暴露因素为基于人口普查的邻里贫困指数[多重贫困指数(IMD)];结局指标为测量的和自我报告的新发行动困难。
在对个体社会经济因素、健康行为和健康状况进行调整后,邻里贫困对身体功能有统计学显著影响。与生活在邻里贫困程度最低的20%地区的人相比,生活在邻里贫困程度最高地区的人自我报告新发行动困难的风险比(RR)为1.75(95%CI 1.14 - 2.70),新发步态速度受损的RR为1.63(95%CI 1.01 - 2.62)。在调整后的模型中,每100名生活在邻里贫困程度最低的20%地区的老年人中,有4.0人(95%CI 3.0 - 5.4)在2年期间出现新发行动困难,而每100名生活在邻里贫困程度最高的20%地区的老年人中有13.6人(95%CI 10.5 - 17.4)出现新发行动困难。
生活在贫困邻里的老年人比生活在贫困程度较低邻里的老年人更有可能出现新发行动困难。这种关系背后的机制尚不清楚,需要开展研究以确定机制和合适的干预措施。