Badve Sunil S, Baehner Frederick L, Gray Robert P, Childs Barrett H, Maddala Tara, Liu Mei-Lan, Rowley Steve C, Shak Steven, Perez Edith A, Shulman Lawrence J, Martino Silvana, Davidson Nancy E, Sledge George W, Goldstein Lori J, Sparano Joseph A
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2473-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6424.
Central and local laboratory concordance for hormone receptor measurement is therapeutically important. This study compares estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) measured by local laboratory immunohistochemistry (IHC), central IHC, and central reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using a proprietary 21-gene assay.
A case-control sample of 776 breast cancer patients from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study E2197 was evaluated. Central IHC Allred score for ER and PR was obtained using tissue microarrays and 1D5 ER antibody and 636 PR antibody. Quantitative RT-PCR for ER and PR in whole sections was performed using the 21-gene assay.
For ER, the concordance between local and central IHC was 90% (95% CI, 88% to 92%), between local IHC and central RT-PCR was 91% (95% CI, 89% to 93%), and between central IHC and central RT-PCR was 93% (95% CI, 91% to 95%). For PR, the concordance between local IHC and central IHC was 84% (95% CI, 82% to 87%), between local IHC and central RT-PCR was 88% (95% CI, 85% to 90%), and between central IHC and central RT-PCR was 90% (95% CI, 88% to 92%). Although concordance was high, IHC ER-negative cases that were RT-PCR positive were more common than IHC ER-positive cases that were RT-PCR negative. In ER-positive patients, ER expression by central IHC Allred score was marginally associated with recurrence (P = .091), and ER expression by central RT-PCR was significantly associated with recurrence (P = .014). However, recurrence score, which incorporates additional genes/pathways, was a highly significant predictor of recurrence (P < .0001).
There is a high degree of concordance among local IHC, central IHC, and central RT-PCR by the proprietary gene assay for ER and PR status. Although ER expression is marginally associated with relapse in ER-positive patients treated with chemohormonal therapy, recurrence score is a highly significant predictor of recurrence.
激素受体检测的中心实验室与本地实验室结果一致性在治疗方面具有重要意义。本研究比较了通过本地实验室免疫组织化学(IHC)、中心实验室IHC以及使用专利21基因检测法的中心实验室逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)的情况。
对来自东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)研究E2197的776例乳腺癌患者的病例对照样本进行了评估。使用组织芯片、1D5 ER抗体和636 PR抗体获得中心实验室ER和PR的IHC Allred评分。使用21基因检测法对全切片进行ER和PR的定量RT-PCR检测。
对于ER,本地实验室与中心实验室IHC之间的一致性为90%(95%CI,88%至92%),本地实验室IHC与中心实验室RT-PCR之间的一致性为91%(95%CI,89%至93%),中心实验室IHC与中心实验室RT-PCR之间的一致性为93%(95%CI,91%至95%)。对于PR,本地实验室IHC与中心实验室IHC之间的一致性为84%(95%CI,82%至87%),本地实验室IHC与中心实验室RT-PCR之间的一致性为88%(95%CI,85%至90%),中心实验室IHC与中心实验室RT-PCR之间的一致性为90%(95%CI,88%至92%)。尽管一致性较高,但RT-PCR阳性的IHC ER阴性病例比RT-PCR阴性的IHC ER阳性病例更常见。在ER阳性患者中,中心实验室IHC Allred评分的ER表达与复发有微弱关联(P = 0.091),而中心实验室RT-PCR的ER表达与复发显著相关(P = 0.014)。然而,纳入了其他基因/通路的复发评分是复发的高度显著预测指标(P < 0.0001)。
通过专利基因检测法检测ER和PR状态时,本地实验室IHC、中心实验室IHC和中心实验室RT-PCR之间具有高度一致性。尽管在接受化学激素治疗的ER阳性患者中,ER表达与复发有微弱关联,但复发评分是复发的高度显著预测指标。