• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The quality of Internet sites providing information relating to hip resurfacing.

作者信息

Saithna A, Ajayi O O, Davis E T

机构信息

The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2008 Apr;6(2):85-7. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80070-4.

DOI:10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80070-4
PMID:18488773
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the accuracy of information available on the Internet regarding hip resurfacing.

METHOD

The top 100 sites found in response to the query 'hip resurfacing' using Google were assessed for quality using the DISCERN instrument and the JAMA benchmarks.

RESULTS

Of the top 100 sites found, only 30 were relevant, available and unique. Of these only six (20%) scored highly for overall quality; however, ten (33%) sites achieved the lowest possible score. Risks and complications were not commonly presented nor were results of surgery. In one case, results presented were grossly misleading.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the Internet to directly market specific products to the public raises the concern that patients are not always fully informed. The quality of health information on the Internet relating to hip resurfacing is of frequently poor and variable quality. Eighty per cent of the sites that we assessed had serious shortcomings.

摘要

相似文献

1
The quality of Internet sites providing information relating to hip resurfacing.
Surgeon. 2008 Apr;6(2):85-7. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(08)80070-4.
2
The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer.互联网口腔癌相关信息网站的质量。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Sep;45(9):e95-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.017. Epub 2009 May 19.
3
Head and neck cancer information on the internet: type, accuracy and content.互联网上的头颈部癌症信息:类型、准确性和内容。
Oral Oncol. 2009 Aug;45(8):675-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.006. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
4
Direct to consumer advertising via the Internet, a study of hip resurfacing.通过互联网直接面向消费者的广告,一项关于髋关节表面置换的研究。
Scott Med J. 2009 Feb;54(1):10-3. doi: 10.1258/rsmsmj.54.1.10.
5
The quality of internet information relating to oral leukoplakia.互联网口腔白斑相关信息的质量。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Sep 1;15(5):e727-31. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e727.
6
The quality of web-based information on hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a cross-sectional survey.
Hip Int. 2006 Oct-Dec;16(4):268-72. doi: 10.1177/112070000601600405.
7
An assessment of the quality and content of information on diverticulitis on the internet.互联网上憩室炎信息的质量与内容评估
Surgeon. 2018 Dec;16(6):359-364. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 May 22.
8
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: time to consider it again? No.髋关节表面置换术:是时候再次考虑它了吗?不。
Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:267-71.
9
Surfing for hip replacements: has the "internet tidal wave" led to better quality information.冲浪寻找髋关节置换:“互联网浪潮”是否带来了更好质量的信息。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul;29(7):1339-1344.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Quality of Online Patient Information.金属对金属全髋关节置换术:在线患者信息的质量
Orthopedics. 2017 Mar 1;40(2):e262-e268. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20161116-02. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Are we being forthright with the patients about vertebral body tethering? Quality, contemporaneity, and readability analysis of the online content about vertebral body tethering.我们在向患者介绍椎体拴系术时是否坦诚?关于椎体拴系术在线内容的质量、时效性和可读性分析。
Spine Deform. 2025 Apr 15. doi: 10.1007/s43390-025-01082-3.
2
Patients With Shoulder Labral Tears Search the Internet to Understand Their Diagnoses and Treatment Options.患有肩关节盂唇撕裂的患者通过互联网了解他们的诊断和治疗选择。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Jul 26;6(6):100983. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100983. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
What Do Patients Encounter When Searching Online About Meniscal Surgery? An Analysis of Internet Trends.
患者在网上搜索半月板手术时会遇到什么?互联网趋势分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jan 24;12(1):23259671231219014. doi: 10.1177/23259671231219014. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Indications for Surgery, Activities After Surgery, and Pain Are the Most Commonly Asked Questions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Reconstruction.手术适应症、术后活动及疼痛是前交叉韧带损伤与重建中最常被问到的问题。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep 17;5(5):100805. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100805. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
Internet search analytics for shoulder arthroplasty: what questions are patients asking?肩关节置换术的互联网搜索分析:患者都在问哪些问题?
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Mar;26(1):55-63. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01347. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
6
Kyphosis-Related Information On The Internet Is the Quality, Content and Readability Sufficient for the Patients?互联网上关于脊柱后凸的信息对患者来说质量、内容和可读性是否足够?
Global Spine J. 2022 Apr;12(3):476-482. doi: 10.1177/21925682211015955. Epub 2021 May 12.
7
Assessment of quality and readability of internet-based health information related to commonly prescribed angiotensin receptor blockers.评估与常用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂相关的基于互联网的健康信息的质量和可读性。
Pan Afr Med J. 2020 Mar 11;35:70. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2020.35.70.18237. eCollection 2020.
8
Quality Assessment of Information on Oral Cancer Provided at Arabic Speaking Websites.阿拉伯语网站提供的口腔癌信息质量评估。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):961-966. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.4.961.
9
The poor quality and reliability of information on periacetabular osteotomy on the internet in Japan.日本互联网上有关髋臼周围截骨术的信息质量和可靠性较差。
Nagoya J Med Sci. 2017 Aug;79(3):375-385. doi: 10.18999/nagjms.79.3.375.
10
Web-based information on glaucoma.基于网络的青光眼信息。
Eye (Lond). 2015 Oct;29(10):1396. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.52. Epub 2015 May 15.