Stålhammar Anna, Boström Barbro
Varberg Hospital, Varberg, Sweden.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Jun;22(2):259-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00524.x.
To prevent dystocia, it is important to have criteria for labour onset and policies for diagnosing and treating uterine inertia. Uterine inertia is often followed by complications such as prolonged labour, caesarean section, instrumental labour and a negative birth experience, and prevention and proper treatment are therefore important. The Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare has stipulated that labour wards should have policies for labour management. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent to which labour wards in Sweden have such policies. For those wards with policies for labour management, a further aim was to study the content of the policies.
A descriptive survey presenting information from 48 of 49 labour wards in Sweden. Descriptive statistics were used.
Three of the 48 labour wards had written policies concerning all four main issues of interest. Written policies existed regarding criteria for labour onset at 11 wards, diagnosis of uterine inertia at 13 wards and treatment of uterine inertia at 21 wards. Seventeen wards had written policies for when during the progress of labour neuraxial analgesia was recommended.
The majority of labour wards in Sweden did not have written policies, and there was no consensus among the wards regarding criteria for diagnosing labour onset and uterine inertia, policies for treatment of uterine inertia, or about recommendations for when to use neuraxial analgesia. It is possible that the lack of policies could imply a risk for nonevidence-based labour management.
为预防难产,制定分娩开始的标准以及子宫收缩乏力的诊断和治疗政策很重要。子宫收缩乏力常伴有产程延长、剖宫产、器械助产和不良分娩体验等并发症,因此预防和恰当治疗很重要。瑞典国家卫生和福利委员会规定,产房应制定分娩管理政策。本研究的目的是调查瑞典产房制定此类政策的程度。对于有分娩管理政策的产房,另一个目的是研究政策的内容。
一项描述性调查,呈现了瑞典49个产房中的48个产房的信息。使用了描述性统计方法。
48个产房中有3个就所有四个主要关注问题制定了书面政策。11个产房有关于分娩开始标准的书面政策,13个产房有关于子宫收缩乏力诊断的书面政策,21个产房有关于子宫收缩乏力治疗的书面政策。17个产房有关于在产程中何时推荐使用椎管内镇痛的书面政策。
瑞典大多数产房没有书面政策,并且各产房在分娩开始和子宫收缩乏力的诊断标准、子宫收缩乏力的治疗政策或椎管内镇痛使用时机的建议方面没有达成共识。政策的缺失可能意味着存在无循证分娩管理的风险。