Sánchez-García Sergio, Juárez-Cedillo Teresa, Mould-Quevedo Joaquín Federico, García-González José Juan, Contreras-Hernández Iris, Espinel-Bermudez Maria Claudia, Hernández-Hernández Dulce María, Garduño-Espinosa Juan, García-Peña Carmen
Unidad de Investigatión Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud del Area de Envejecimiento, Centro Médico Nacional Siglo XXI (CMN-SXXI), Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), Mexico City, Mexico.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2008 Jun;22(2):306-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00528.x.
Aging of the population represents one of the main challenges for health systems because of the increase in the demand for hospital services. To be able to count on tools that allow an objective evaluation of hospital-resource use becomes indispensable for health systems.
To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP) regarding the appropriateness of admissions and hospital stays in elderly patients. In a scenario of scarce resources, to have a valid instrument will make it possible to evaluate the process of care in our growing elderly population in a standardized way.
We carried out a retrospective study of 144 randomly chosen elderly patients admitted to the hospital with 394 even-numbered hospital-stay days. For the reliability analysis between the pair of nurses with the AEP and the pair of specialists, the details of the hospital admissions and the stay days were obtained from the clinical files. Criteria validity was conducted by pairs of physicians, including two internists, two general surgeons and two geriatricians. Only the agreements were compared with agreements of the AEP-trained nurses. Disagreements were excluded from the final analysis.
Inter-rater (inter-reviewer) agreement of hospital admissions and days spent by the patient presented a kappa coefficient of >0.70, while these admissions and hospital-stay days was >0.70. Sensitivity and positive predictor value to detect inappropriate admissions were not calculated because no agreement existed on inappropriate admissions. Specificity and negative predictive value to detect appropriate admission was >94.0% and >98.0%. Sensitivity and positive predictor value to detect inappropriate hospital-stay days was >44.0% and >10.0%, while specificity and negative predictor value for detecting appropriate hospital-stay days was >79.0% and >88.0%.
AEP's high-reliability and moderate-validity results with regard to clinical judgement positions it as a useful instrument for appropriate hospitalization screening in elderly patients.
由于医院服务需求的增加,人口老龄化是卫生系统面临的主要挑战之一。对于卫生系统来说,拥有能够客观评估医院资源使用情况的工具变得不可或缺。
评估适宜性评估方案(AEP)在老年患者入院和住院适宜性方面的可靠性和有效性。在资源稀缺的情况下,拥有一个有效的工具将使我们能够以标准化的方式评估不断增长的老年人群的护理过程。
我们对144例随机选取的老年住院患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者共有394个偶数住院日。为了分析AEP培训的护士与专家之间在入院和住院天数方面的可靠性,从临床档案中获取了医院入院和住院天数的详细信息。标准效度由内科医生、普通外科医生和老年病医生组成的医生对进行评估。仅将这些医生对之间的一致性与经过AEP培训的护士之间的一致性进行比较。最终分析排除不一致的情况。
评估者间(审阅者间)在医院入院和患者住院天数方面的一致性kappa系数>0.70,而这些入院和住院天数的一致性也>0.70。由于在不适当入院方面不存在一致性,因此未计算检测不适当入院的敏感性和阳性预测值。检测适当入院的特异性和阴性预测值>94.0%和>98.0%。检测不适当住院天数的敏感性和阳性预测值>44.0%和>10.0%,而检测适当住院天数的特异性和阴性预测值>79.0%和>88.0%。
AEP在临床判断方面具有高可靠性和中等效度的结果,使其成为老年患者适宜住院筛查的有用工具。