Suppr超能文献

[慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺肿瘤患者住院不足及住院期间非活动天数]

[Inadequate hospital admissions and inactive days of hospital stay in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung neoplasms].

作者信息

Bañeres J, Alonso J, Broquetas J, Antó J M

机构信息

Departamento de Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Instituto Municipal de Investigación Médica, Barcelona.

出版信息

Med Clin (Barc). 1993 Mar 20;100(11):407-11.

PMID:8464256
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was carried out to evaluate the hypothesis that the proportion of inadequate hospital admissions and days is greater in patients with pulmonary neoplasm than in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) given the therapeutic and diagnostic features of both diseases and to establish the applicability of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP).

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the medical records of patients admitted for COPD and pulmonary neoplasm. Two external physicians reviewed the clinical histories using the AEP. Admissions and hospital days considered as potentially inadequate by the reviewers were supervised by a clinical epidemiological panel which confirmed and identified the causes for inadequacy. One hundred sixty-six patients admitted with COPD and 79 with pulmonary neoplasm selected by a systematic sample of admissions whose principal diagnosis was COPD or pulmonary neoplasm were studied over one year in a tertiary level teaching hospital in Barcelona.

RESULTS

It was found that 4.8% of the admissions with COPD and 15.5% of the days of hospital stay were inappropriate while in patients with pulmonary neoplasm 14% of the admissions and 40% of the days of hospital stay were inappropriate. The main causes of inadequacy were: social (33.3% in patients with COPD); patients inadequately admitted but who remained in hospital to undergo diagnostic tests which could have been performed on an out patients basis (46% in patients with pulmonary neoplasm).

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriateness was greater in admissions and in hospital days with greater diagnostic components (pulmonary neoplasm) than in fundamentally therapeutic cases (COPD). The Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol was valid in this hospital with the supervising panel being very useful in the judgement of cases not clearly established in the protocol. The level of inadequacy was found to be similar to that of other studies although the results are not directly comparable.

摘要

背景

鉴于两种疾病的治疗和诊断特征,本研究旨在评估以下假设:与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者相比,肺肿瘤患者住院不适当的比例及住院天数更多,并确定适宜性评估方案(AEP)的适用性。

方法

对因COPD和肺肿瘤入院患者的病历进行回顾性分析。两名外部医生使用AEP对临床病史进行审查。审查人员认为可能不适当的住院和住院天数由临床流行病学小组进行监督,该小组确认并确定不适当的原因。在巴塞罗那一家三级教学医院,通过对主要诊断为COPD或肺肿瘤的入院患者进行系统抽样,选取了166例COPD患者和79例肺肿瘤患者,进行了为期一年的研究。

结果

发现COPD患者中4.8%的住院和15.5%的住院天数不适当,而肺肿瘤患者中14%的住院和40%的住院天数不适当。不适当的主要原因是:社会因素(COPD患者中占33.3%);患者入院不适当,但留在医院接受本可在门诊进行的诊断检查(肺肿瘤患者中占46%)。

结论

与基本为治疗性的病例(COPD)相比,诊断成分较多的住院和住院天数(肺肿瘤)的不适当情况更多。适宜性评估方案在该医院有效,监督小组在判断方案中未明确规定的病例时非常有用。尽管结果不能直接比较,但发现不适当水平与其他研究相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验