Carolinas Medical Center, 1000 Blythe Boulevard, MEB #601, Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28203, United States.
Injury. 2009 May;40(5):564-6. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.024. Epub 2008 May 19.
The electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer (EBVS) was developed as an alternative to sutures, clips, and the ultrasonic scalpel for haemostasis during open and laparoscopic surgery. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to objectively evaluate the performance of the EBVS during trauma surgery. Data from trauma cases, in which the EBVS was used, was collected prospectively for 19 consecutive months. Data collected included: total number of EBVS applications, need for additional haemostatic devices after application, calculated time savings or loss, and hemorrhagic complications. The EBVS was used in 23 trauma cases consisting of 13 small bowel resections, 4 ileocolectomies, 2 left hemicolectomies, 1 transverse colectomy, 1 right hemicolectomy with roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and duodenostomy, 1 Hartmann's procedure, and 1 splenorrhaphy with omental injury repair. A total of 631 applications of the device were used, averaging 27.4 applications per case. An additional suture ligature or clip placed for an inadequate EBVS seal (failure) was needed in only 1.5% of the total EBVS applications. All of these (10) occurred in one patient undergoing Hartmann's procedure for massive colonic injury. An additional 45 sutures or clips for non-EBVS failure were used in 5 cases due to proximity of bleeding to critical vascular, biliary, or bowel structures. In 17 trauma cases (74%) with intestinal resection no other means of hemostasis (sutures or clips) was required except the EBVS. The mean calculated time savings using the EBVS was 26.8 min (range 9.8-48) per case. There were no haemorrhagic complications. The EBVS is safe and effective for intestinal resections and haemostasis in trauma surgery. This novel energy source reliably seals major mesenteric vessels with little need for sutures or clips. Using the EBVS can substantially shorten operative time.
电热双极血管密封器(EBVS)是作为缝线、夹子和超声刀的替代品开发的,用于开放和腹腔镜手术中的止血。这项前瞻性临床研究的目的是客观评估 EBVS 在创伤手术中的性能。在连续 19 个月内,前瞻性地收集了使用 EBVS 的创伤病例的数据。收集的数据包括:EBVS 的总应用次数、应用后需要额外止血装置的次数、计算出的节省或损失时间,以及出血并发症。EBVS 用于 23 例创伤病例,包括 13 例小肠切除术、4 例回肠结肠切除术、2 例左半结肠切除术、1 例横结肠切除术、1 例右半结肠切除术伴 Roux-en-Y 胃空肠吻合术和十二指肠造口术、1 例 Hartmann 手术和 1 例脾破裂伴网膜损伤修复术。总共使用了 631 次该设备,平均每个病例使用 27.4 次。仅在 1.5%的总 EBVS 应用中需要额外的缝线结扎或夹子,以弥补 EBVS 密封不充分(失败)。所有这些(10 个)都发生在一名因大量结肠损伤而行 Hartmann 手术的患者中。由于出血靠近关键的血管、胆道或肠结构,在 5 例患者中使用了 45 个额外的缝线或夹子,这些病例都不是 EBVS 失败。在 17 例(74%)有肠切除术的创伤病例中,除了 EBVS 外,不需要其他止血方法(缝线或夹子)。使用 EBVS 的平均计算节省时间为每个病例 26.8 分钟(范围 9.8-48)。没有出血并发症。EBVS 安全有效,可用于创伤手术中的肠切除术和止血。这种新型能源可靠地密封主要肠系膜血管,几乎不需要缝线或夹子。使用 EBVS 可以大大缩短手术时间。