Hillier Teresa A, Vesco Kimberly K, Pedula Kathryn L, Beil Tracy L, Whitlock Evelyn P, Pettitt David J
Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon 97227, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2008 May 20;148(10):766-75. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00009.
In 2003, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded that evidence was insufficient to advise for or against routinely screening all pregnant women for gestational diabetes mellitus.
To review evidence about the benefits and harms of screening for gestational diabetes.
Databases (MEDLINE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment Database, National Institute for Health and Clinical Effectiveness, and Cochrane Library) were searched for reports published from January 2000 to 15 November 2007 (and from 1966 to 1999 for additional studies on screening at less than 24 weeks' gestation), citations in the 2003 evidence report, and studies identified through consultation of experts and searches of bibliographies.
English-language studies that used standard 1- or 2-step testing for gestational diabetes and that evaluated at least 1 of the following outcomes: neonatal mortality; brachial plexus injury; clavicular fracture; admission to a neonatal intensive care unit for hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, or the respiratory distress syndrome; maternal mortality; and preeclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension.
2 reviewers evaluated 1607 abstracts, critically appraised 288 articles, and qualitatively synthesized 13 studies.
No randomized, controlled trials that directly evaluated the risks and benefits of gestational diabetes screening were found. One good-quality randomized, controlled trial of treatment of mild gestational diabetes in a screening-detected population supported a reduction in serious neonatal complications and showed that gestational diabetes treatment also reduced the risk for gestational hypertension. Very limited evidence was found to evaluate early screening for gestational diabetes (before 24 weeks' gestation). Limited evidence suggests that serious maternal hypoglycemia is rare with treatment and that overall quality of life is not worse among women receiving gestational diabetes treatment compared with women not receiving treatment.
The literature is limited by lack of a consistent standard for screening or diagnosis of gestational diabetes.
Limited evidence suggests that gestational diabetes treatment after 24 weeks improves some maternal and neonatal outcomes. Evidence is even more sparse for screening before 24 weeks' gestation.
2003年,美国预防服务工作组得出结论,证据不足,无法建议对所有孕妇进行常规妊娠糖尿病筛查或反对这样做。
回顾关于妊娠糖尿病筛查的益处和危害的证据。
检索数据库(MEDLINE、循证医学数据库、卫生技术评估数据库、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所和考克兰图书馆),查找2000年1月至2007年11月15日发表的报告(对于妊娠少于24周时筛查的其他研究,则查找1966年至1999年发表的报告)、2003年证据报告中的引文,以及通过专家咨询和参考文献检索确定的研究。
使用标准的1步或2步检测法检测妊娠糖尿病的英文研究,且评估了以下至少一项结果:新生儿死亡率;臂丛神经损伤;锁骨骨折;因低血糖、高胆红素血症或呼吸窘迫综合征入住新生儿重症监护病房;孕产妇死亡率;以及先兆子痫或妊娠高血压。
两名评审员评估了1607篇摘要,严格评价了288篇文章,并对13项研究进行了定性综合分析。
未找到直接评估妊娠糖尿病筛查风险和益处的随机对照试验。一项在筛查发现的人群中对轻度妊娠糖尿病治疗进行的高质量随机对照试验支持减少严重新生儿并发症,并表明妊娠糖尿病治疗还降低了妊娠高血压的风险。发现评估妊娠糖尿病早期筛查(妊娠24周前)的证据非常有限。有限的证据表明,治疗时严重的孕产妇低血糖很少见,与未接受治疗的女性相比,接受妊娠糖尿病治疗的女性总体生活质量并不更差。
文献因缺乏妊娠糖尿病筛查或诊断的一致标准而受到限制。
有限的证据表明,妊娠24周后进行妊娠糖尿病治疗可改善一些孕产妇和新生儿结局。妊娠24周前筛查的证据更为稀少。