Suppr超能文献

在社区获得性肺炎中,收缩压在预测预后方面优于其他血流动力学指标。

Systolic blood pressure is superior to other haemodynamic predictors of outcome in community acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Chalmers J D, Singanayagam A, Hill A T

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.

出版信息

Thorax. 2008 Aug;63(8):698-702. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.095562. Epub 2008 May 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Admission blood pressure (BP) assessment is a central component of severity assessment for community acquired pneumonia. The aim of this study was to establish which readily available haemodynamic measure on admission is most useful for predicting severity in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia was conducted in Edinburgh, UK. The measurements compared were systolic and diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure. The outcomes of interest were 30 day mortality and the requirement for mechanical ventilation and/or inotropic support.

RESULTS

Admission systolic BP < 90 mm Hg, diastolic BP < or = 60 mm Hg, mean arterial pressure < 70 mm Hg and pulse pressure < or = 40 mm Hg were all associated with increased 30 day mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation and/or inotropic support on multivariate logistic regression. The AUC values for each predictor of 30 day mortality were as follows: systolic BP < 90 mm Hg 0.70; diastolic BP < or = 60 mm Hg 0.59; mean arterial pressure < 70 mm Hg 0.64; and pulse pressure < or = 40 mm Hg 0.60. The AUC values for each predictor of need for mechanical ventilation and/or inotropic support were as follows: systolic BP < 90 mm Hg 0.70; diastolic BP < or = 60 mm Hg 0.68; mean arterial pressure < 70 mm Hg 0.69; and pulse pressure < or = 40 mm Hg 0.59. A simplified CRB65 score containing systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg alone performed equally well to standard CRB65 score (AUC 0.76 vs 0.74) and to the standard CURB65 score (0.76 vs 0.76) for the prediction of 30 day mortality. The simplified CRB65 score was equivalent for prediction of mechanical ventilation and/or inotropic support to standard CRB65 (0.77 vs 0.77) and to CURB65 (0.77 vs 0.78).

CONCLUSION

Systolic BP is superior to other haemodynamic predictors of 30 day mortality and need for mechanical ventilation and/or inotropic support in community acquired pneumonia. The CURB65 score can be simplified to a modified CRB65 score by omission of the diastolic BP criterion without compromising its accuracy.

摘要

引言

入院时血压(BP)评估是社区获得性肺炎严重程度评估的核心组成部分。本研究的目的是确定入院时哪种易于获得的血流动力学指标最有助于预测社区获得性肺炎患者的严重程度。

方法

在英国爱丁堡对社区获得性肺炎患者进行了一项前瞻性观察研究。比较的测量指标为收缩压和舒张压、平均动脉压和脉压。感兴趣的结局为30天死亡率以及机械通气和/或使用血管活性药物支持的需求。

结果

多因素逻辑回归分析显示,入院时收缩压<90mmHg、舒张压≤60mmHg、平均动脉压<70mmHg和脉压≤40mmHg均与30天死亡率增加以及机械通气和/或使用血管活性药物支持的需求相关。各30天死亡率预测指标的AUC值如下:收缩压<90mmHg为0.70;舒张压≤60mmHg为0.59;平均动脉压<70mmHg为0.64;脉压≤40mmHg为0.60。各机械通气和/或使用血管活性药物支持需求预测指标的AUC值如下:收缩压<90mmHg为0.70;舒张压≤60mmHg为0.68;平均动脉压<70mmHg为0.69;脉压≤40mmHg为0.59。仅包含收缩压<90mmHg的简化CRB65评分在预测30天死亡率方面与标准CRB65评分(AUC分别为0.76和0.74)以及标准CURB65评分(0.76和0.76)表现相当。简化CRB65评分在预测机械通气和/或使用血管活性药物支持方面与标准CRB65评分(0.77和0.77)以及CURB65评分(0.77和0.78)相当。

结论

在社区获得性肺炎中,收缩压在预测30天死亡率以及机械通气和/或使用血管活性药物支持的需求方面优于其他血流动力学预测指标。通过省略舒张压标准,CURB65评分可简化为改良的CRB65评分,而不影响其准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验