Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜下与剖腹和阴道筋膜内子宫切除术的比较。

Pelviscopic compared to laparotomic and vaginal intrafascial hysterectomy.

作者信息

Mettler L, Lutzewitsch N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel Michaelisstraße 16 Kiel D-24105 Germany.

出版信息

Diagn Ther Endosc. 1997;3(4):231-9. doi: 10.1155/DTE.3.231.

Abstract

Between 1993 and 1994, 368 women underwent hysterectomies for benign disorders at the University of Kiel. Of these, 58.7% were performed either by pelviscopic or by laparotomy Classic Intrafascial Supracervical Hysterectomy (CISH). Of the remaining, 14.8% were performed by abdominal hysterectomy, 13.6% by Intrafascial Vaginal Hysterectomy (IVH), 12.2% by Vaginal Hysterectomy (VH), and only 0.05% by Laparoscopic Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy (LAVH). Comparative data of these six surgical techniques concerning patients characteristics, indications for operation, histological features, blood loss, operating time, hospital stay, uterine weights and postoperatively used analgesics are described.

摘要

1993年至1994年间,基尔大学有368名女性因良性疾病接受了子宫切除术。其中,58.7%的手术是通过腹腔镜或开腹经典筋膜内子宫颈上切除术(CISH)进行的。其余患者中,14.8%接受了腹式子宫切除术,13.6%接受了筋膜内阴道子宫切除术(IVH),12.2%接受了阴道子宫切除术(VH),而只有0.05%接受了腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术(LAVH)。本文描述了这六种手术技术在患者特征、手术指征、组织学特征、失血量、手术时间、住院时间、子宫重量及术后使用镇痛药方面的对比数据。

相似文献

10
Laparoscopic hysterectomy: challenges and limitations.腹腔镜子宫切除术:挑战与局限
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14(3):145-59. doi: 10.1080/13645700510034010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验