Suppr超能文献

MTT 法作为胃癌体外化学敏感性检测的预测价值:一家机构的经验

Predictive value of MTT assay as an in vitro chemosensitivity testing for gastric cancer: one institution's experience.

作者信息

Wu Bin, Zhu Jin-Shui, Zhang Yi, Shen Wei-Ming, Zhang Qiang

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Sixth Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Yishang Road 600, Shanghai 200223, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2008 May 21;14(19):3064-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.3064.

Abstract

AIM

To investigate the predictive clinical value of in vitro 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay for directing chemosensitivity in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

Results of a total of 353 consecutive patients with gastric cancer treated with MTT-directed chemotherapy or physician's empirical chemotherapy from July 1997 to April 2003 were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The overall 5-year survival rate of MTT-sensitive group (MSG) and control group (CG) was 47.5% and 45.1%, respectively. The results of subgroup analysis with Cox proportional-hazards model were favorable for the MSG-sensitive group. However, no statistically significant difference in survival rate was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Individualized chemotherapy based on in vitro MTT assay is beneficial, but needs to be confirmed by further randomized controlled trials.

摘要

目的

探讨体外3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)法对指导胃癌患者化疗敏感性的临床预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析1997年7月至2003年4月期间共353例接受MTT指导化疗或医生经验性化疗的连续性胃癌患者的结果。

结果

MTT敏感组(MSG)和对照组(CG)的总体5年生存率分别为47.5%和45.1%。Cox比例风险模型亚组分析结果对MSG敏感组有利。然而,两组之间的生存率无统计学显著差异。

结论

基于体外MTT法的个体化化疗有益,但需要进一步的随机对照试验予以证实。

相似文献

9
10
Predictive chemotherapy of advanced breast cancer directed by MTT assay in vitro.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1999 Jan;53(1):77-85. doi: 10.1023/a:1006122912146.

引用本文的文献

1
Chemotherapy drug potency assessment method of ovarian cancer cells by digital holography microscopy.
Biomed Opt Express. 2022 Jul 27;13(8):4370-4385. doi: 10.1364/BOE.465149. eCollection 2022 Aug 1.
2
Cancer Stem Cell Assay for the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.
HSOA J Stem Cells Res Dev Ther. 2021;7(3). doi: 10.24966/srdt-2060/100076. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
4
Analysis of Primary Tumor Specimens for Evaluation of Cancer Therapeutics.
Annu Rev Cancer Biol. 2021 Mar;5:39-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-043020-125955. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Sophocarpine can enhance the inhibiting effect of oxaliplatin on colon cancer liver metastasis-in vitro and in vivo.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;394(6):1263-1274. doi: 10.1007/s00210-020-02032-8. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
High-throughput dynamic BH3 profiling may quickly and accurately predict effective therapies in solid tumors.
Sci Signal. 2020 Jun 16;13(636):eaay1451. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aay1451.
7
Effect of calcium glucoheptonate on proliferation and osteogenesis of osteoblast-like cells in vitro.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 9;14(9):e0222240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222240. eCollection 2019.
9
Personalized in vitro cancer models to predict therapeutic response: Challenges and a framework for improvement.
Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Sep;165:79-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 21.
10
Perspectives in chemosensitivity and chemoresistance assays and their implementation in head and neck cancer.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Dec;273(12):4073-4080. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3893-1. Epub 2016 Jan 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Connecting chemosensitivity, gene expression and disease.
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008 Jan;29(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2007.10.015. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
2
Changing trends in gastrointestinal disease in the Asia-Pacific region.
J Dig Dis. 2007 Nov;8(4):179-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2007.00304.x.
3
Multidrug resistance in gastric cancer: recent research advances and ongoing therapeutic challenges.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007 Oct;7(10):1369-78. doi: 10.1586/14737140.7.10.1369.
4
Therapeutic options in gastric cancer: neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs postoperative chemoradiotherapy.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2007 Aug;21(9):1084-7; discussion 1090, 1096-8, 1101.
5
Molecular genetic markers as predictors of response to chemotherapy in gliomas.
Curr Opin Oncol. 2007 Nov;19(6):606-11. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3282f075f3.
6
Palliative management of gastric cancer.
Surg Oncol. 2007 Dec;16(4):267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
7
Methods and goals for the use of in vitro and in vivo chemosensitivity testing.
Mol Biotechnol. 2007 Feb;35(2):185-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02686104.
8
Challenges of chemosensitivity testing.
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Sep 15;12(18):5258-9. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1656.
9
Gastric cancer--new therapeutic options.
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jul 6;355(1):76-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068121.
10
Determinants of chemosensitivity in gastric cancer.
Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006 Aug;6(4):337-44. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2006.05.002. Epub 2006 Jun 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验