Sanai Nader, Berger Mitchel S
Brain Tumor Research Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2008 Apr;62(4):753-64; discussion 264-6. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf.
There is still no general consensus in the literature regarding the role of extent of glioma resection in improving patient outcome. Although the importance of resection in obtaining tissue diagnosis and alleviating symptoms is clear, a lack of Class I evidence prevents similar certainty in assessing the influence of extent of resection.
We reviewed every major clinical publication since 1990 on the role of extent of resection in glioma outcome.
Twenty-eight high-grade glioma articles and 10 low-grade glioma articles were examined in terms of quality of evidence, expected extent of resection, and survival benefit.
Despite persistent limitations in the quality of data, mounting evidence suggests that more extensive surgical resection is associated with longer life expectancy for both low- and high-grade gliomas.
关于胶质瘤切除范围在改善患者预后方面的作用,文献中仍未达成普遍共识。虽然切除在获取组织诊断和缓解症状方面的重要性是明确的,但缺乏I类证据使得在评估切除范围的影响时无法有类似的确定性。
我们回顾了自1990年以来关于切除范围在胶质瘤预后中作用的每一篇主要临床出版物。
从证据质量、预期切除范围和生存获益方面对28篇高级别胶质瘤文章和10篇低级别胶质瘤文章进行了审查。
尽管数据质量一直存在局限性,但越来越多的证据表明,更广泛的手术切除与低级别和高级别胶质瘤患者更长的预期寿命相关。