Cook Karon F, Choi Seung W, Crane Paul K, Deyo Richard A, Johnson Kurt L, Amtmann Dagmar
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 20;33(12):1378-83. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181732acb.
A post hoc simulation of a computer adaptive administration of the items of a modified version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.
To evaluate the effectiveness of adaptive administration of back pain-related disability items compared with a fixed 11-item short form.
Short form versions of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire have been developed. An alternative to paper-and-pencil short forms is to administer items adaptively so that items are presented based on a person's responses to previous items. Theoretically, this allows precise estimation of back pain disability with administration of only a few items.
Data were gathered from 2 previously conducted studies of persons with back pain. An item response theory model was used to calibrate scores based on all items, items of a paper-and-pencil short form, and several computer adaptive tests (CATs).
Correlations between each CAT condition and scores based on a 23-item version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire ranged from 0.93 to 0.98. Compared with an 11-item short form, an 11-item CAT produced scores that were significantly more highly correlated with scores based on the 23-item scale. CATs with even fewer items also produced scores that were highly correlated with scores based on all items. For example, scores from a 5-item CAT had a correlation of 0.93 with full scale scores. Seven- and 9-item CATs correlated at 0.95 and 0.97, respectively. A CAT with a standard-error-based stopping rule produced scores that correlated at 0.95 with full scale scores.
A CAT-based back pain-related disability measure may be a valuable tool for use in clinical and research contexts. Use of CAT for other common measures in back pain research, such as other functional scales or measures of psychological distress, may offer similar advantages.
对改良版罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷项目进行计算机自适应管理的事后模拟。
评估与固定的11项简表相比,背痛相关残疾项目自适应管理的有效性。
已开发出罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷的简表版本。除纸笔简表外,另一种方式是自适应管理项目,即根据个人对先前项目的回答来呈现项目。理论上,这样只需管理少数项目就能精确估计背痛残疾情况。
数据来自之前两项对背痛患者的研究。使用项目反应理论模型,根据所有项目、纸笔简表项目以及几种计算机自适应测试(CAT)来校准分数。
每种CAT条件与基于23项罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷版本的分数之间的相关性在0.93至0.98之间。与11项简表相比,11项CAT产生的分数与基于23项量表的分数显著更高度相关。项目更少的CAT产生的分数也与基于所有项目的分数高度相关。例如,5项CAT的分数与全量表分数的相关性为0.93。7项和9项CAT的相关性分别为0.95和0.97。基于标准误差停止规则的CAT产生的分数与全量表分数的相关性为0.95。
基于CAT的背痛相关残疾测量可能是临床和研究中使用的有价值工具。在背痛研究中,将CAT用于其他常见测量,如其他功能量表或心理困扰测量,可能也具有类似优势。