Livingstone Sonia, Markham Tim
Department of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK.
Br J Sociol. 2008 Jun;59(2):351-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00197.x.
A national UK survey (N = 1017) examined the association between media consumption and three indicators of civic participation - likelihood of voting, interest in politics, and actions taken in response to a public issue of concern to the respondent. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the variance explained by media use variables after first controlling for demographic, social and political predictors of each indicator of participation. Media use significantly added to explaining variance in civic participation as follows. In accounting for voting, demographic and political/social factors mattered, but so too did some media habits (listening to the radio and engagement with the news). Interest in politics was accounted for by political/social factors and by media use, especially higher news engagement and lower media trust. However, taking action on an issue of concern was accounted for only by political/social factors, with the exception that slightly fewer actions were taken by those who watched more television. These findings provided little support for the media malaise thesis, and instead were interpreted as providing qualified support for the cognitive/motivational theory of news as a means of engaging the public.
英国一项全国性调查(N = 1017)研究了媒体消费与公民参与的三个指标之间的关联,这三个指标分别是投票可能性、政治兴趣以及针对受访者所关注的公共问题采取的行动。在首先控制了每个参与指标的人口统计学、社会和政治预测因素之后,使用多元回归分析来检验由媒体使用变量所解释的方差。媒体使用对公民参与方差的解释作用显著,具体如下。在解释投票行为时,人口统计学和政治/社会因素很重要,但一些媒体习惯(收听广播和关注新闻)也同样重要。政治兴趣由政治/社会因素以及媒体使用来解释,尤其是更高的新闻关注度和更低的媒体信任度。然而,针对所关注问题采取行动仅由政治/社会因素来解释,唯一的例外是看电视较多的人采取的行动略少。这些发现几乎没有为媒体弊病论提供支持,相反,它们被解释为为将新闻作为吸引公众手段的认知/动机理论提供了有限的支持。