Finger Werner J, Kurokawa Rie, Takahashi Hidekazu, Komatsu Masashi
Department of Preclinical Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Cologne, Kerpenerstr. 32, 50931 Cologne, Germany.
Dent Mater. 2008 Dec;24(12):1655-60. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.025. Epub 2008 May 21.
Aim of this study was to investigate the depth reproduction of differently wide sulci with elastomeric impression materials by single- and double-mix techniques using a tooth and sulcus model, simulating clinical conditions.
Impressions with one vinyl polysiloxane (VPS; FLE), two polyethers (PE; IMP and P2), and one hybrid VPS/PE elastomer (FUS) were taken from a truncated steel cone with a circumferential 2 mm deep sulcus, 50, 100 or 200 microm wide. The "root surface" was in steel and the "periodontal tissue" in reversible hydrocolloid. Single-mix impressions were taken with light-body (L) or monophase (M) pastes, double-mix impressions with L as syringe and M or heavy-body (H) as tray materials (n=8). Sulcus reproduction was determined by 3D laser topography of impressions at eight locations, 45 degrees apart. Statistical data analysis by ANOVA and multiple comparison tests (p<0.05).
For 200 microm wide sulci, significant differences were found between impression materials only: FLE=IMP>FUS=P2. At 50 and 100 microm width, significant differences were found between materials (IMP>FUS=FLE>P2) and techniques (L+H=L+M>M>L).
The sulcus model is considered useful for screening evaluation of elastomeric impression materials ability to reproduce narrow sulci. All tested materials and techniques reproduced 200 microm wide sulci to almost nominal depth. Irrespective of the impression technique used, IMP showed the best penetration ability in 50 and 100 microm sulci. Double-mix techniques are more suitable to reproduce narrow sulci than single-mix techniques.
本研究旨在使用牙齿和龈沟模型,通过单混和双混技术,模拟临床条件,研究不同宽度龈沟在弹性印模材料中的深度再现情况。
从一个截顶钢圆锥体上制取印模,该圆锥体有一个圆周方向2mm深的龈沟,宽度为50、100或200微米。“牙根表面”为钢质,“牙周组织”为可逆性水胶体。单混印模采用轻体(L)或单相(M)糊剂制取,双混印模采用L作为注射器材料,M或重体(H)作为托盘材料(n = 8)。通过对印模八个位置进行三维激光地形测量来确定龈沟再现情况,各位置相隔45度。采用方差分析和多重比较检验进行统计数据分析(p<0.05)。
对于200微米宽的龈沟,仅在印模材料之间发现显著差异:FLE = IMP > FUS = P2。在50和100微米宽度时,在材料(IMP > FUS = FLE > P2)和技术(L + H = L + M > M > L)之间发现显著差异。
龈沟模型被认为有助于对弹性印模材料再现窄龈沟能力进行筛选评估。所有测试材料和技术都能将200微米宽的龈沟再现到几乎标称深度。无论使用何种印模技术,IMP在50和100微米龈沟中均表现出最佳的渗透能力。双混技术比单混技术更适合再现窄龈沟。