Wang Cheng, Slikker William
Division of Neurotoxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research/F3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079-9502, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2008 Jun;106(6):1643-58. doi: 10.1213/ane.ob013e3181732c01.
Advances in pediatric and obstetric surgery have resulted in an increase in the duration and complexity of procedures requiring anesthesia. It has been reported that anesthetic drugs cause widespread and dose-dependent apoptosis in the developing rat brain. The similarity of the physiology, pharmacology, metabolism, and reproductive systems of the nonhuman primate to that of the human, especially during pregnancy, make the monkey an exceptionally good animal model for assessing potential neurotoxic effects of anesthetics. The window of vulnerability to these neuronal effects of pediatric anesthetics is restricted to the period of rapid synaptogenesis, also known as the brain growth spurt period. To minimize the risks to children resulting from the use of anesthesia, the following questions should be addressed: 1. What is the relationship between exposure and brain cell loss for drugs commonly used in the practice of pediatric anesthesia (inhaled anesthetics, midazolam, ketamine, and nitrous oxide)? 2. Are there "class effects," or does each drug need to be considered independently? 3. Are there important interactions among the drugs used as anesthetics contributing to the risk of brain cell death? 4. What is the likely period of human vulnerability? Pharmacogenomic/system biology approaches have great potential for helping to advance the understanding of brain-related biological processes, including neuronal plasticity and neurotoxicity. Because of the complexity and temporal features of how developmental neurotoxicity is manifested, pharmacogenomic/systems biology approaches may prove to be useful tools for enhancing our understanding of the biological processes induced by anesthetics. Therefore, the main purpose of this review is to describe the application of these approaches and models, as well as protection strategies, especially as regards the issue of anesthetic-induced neuronal cell death during development. Much of the discussion that follows is based on experiments conducted with ketamine. This is due in part to the use of ketamine in the early studies and the volume of preclinical experimental work performed with this drug, as well as its use in anesthetic studies in developing rodents and nonhuman primates. Although ketamine use in pediatric anesthesia is relatively limited, the findings of the studies are sufficiently strong to merit concern about the N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist drugs as a class. Our focus on ketamine should not be construed as implying that the risk of neurodegeneration with ketamine is greater, or less, than with other anesthetics. We are simply describing the effects where we have the most preclinical data.
儿科和产科手术的进展导致需要麻醉的手术时间延长、复杂性增加。据报道,麻醉药物会在发育中的大鼠大脑中引起广泛的、剂量依赖性的细胞凋亡。非人类灵长类动物在生理、药理、代谢和生殖系统方面与人类相似,尤其是在孕期,这使得猴子成为评估麻醉药潜在神经毒性作用的极佳动物模型。小儿麻醉药对这些神经元效应的易损期局限于快速突触形成期,即所谓的脑发育激增期。为了将麻醉使用给儿童带来的风险降至最低,应解决以下问题:1. 小儿麻醉实践中常用药物(吸入麻醉药、咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和氧化亚氮)的暴露与脑细胞损失之间有何关系?2. 是否存在“类效应”,还是每种药物都需要单独考虑?3. 用作麻醉剂的药物之间是否存在重要的相互作用,从而增加脑细胞死亡的风险?4. 人类可能的易损期是什么?药物基因组学/系统生物学方法在帮助推进对与大脑相关的生物学过程(包括神经元可塑性和神经毒性)的理解方面具有巨大潜力。由于发育性神经毒性表现方式的复杂性和时间特征,药物基因组学/系统生物学方法可能被证明是增强我们对麻醉药诱导的生物学过程理解的有用工具。因此,本综述的主要目的是描述这些方法和模型的应用以及保护策略,特别是关于发育过程中麻醉诱导的神经元细胞死亡问题。以下大部分讨论基于用氯胺酮进行的实验。部分原因是早期研究中使用了氯胺酮,以及针对该药物进行的大量临床前实验工作,还有其在发育中的啮齿动物和非人类灵长类动物麻醉研究中的使用。尽管氯胺酮在小儿麻醉中的使用相对有限,但这些研究结果足够有力,值得关注作为一类的N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸拮抗剂药物。我们对氯胺酮的关注不应被理解为暗示氯胺酮导致神经退行性变的风险比其他麻醉药更大或更小。我们只是在描述我们拥有最多临床前数据的效应。