Schörner W, Kunz D, Henkes H, Sander B, Schmidt D, Felix R
Radiologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Freie Universität Berlin.
Rofo. 1991 Apr;154(4):430-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1033162.
The effect of various factors on the demonstration of calcified lesions was studied in 131 areas of calcification which had been demonstrated by CT. By means of MRI (SE 400/30 or GE315/14, 90 degrees and SE 1600/30 + 70; 0.5T) 117 of the 131 calcified lesions (89%) produced a signal difference. Of these 117 lesions, 80 (61%) were recognised as calcification by MRI. Large areas of calcification (more than 5 mm) and high density calcification (more than 100 Hu) were recognised significantly more often than small or low density calcifications. T2-weighted images demonstrated calcification more often than other sequences. With conventional pulse sequences, calcified lesions were frequently recognised as abnormalities on MRI, but their recognition as calcified lesions is unreliable.
在131个经CT证实的钙化灶区域研究了各种因素对钙化病变显示的影响。通过MRI(SE 400/30或GE315/14,90度以及SE 1600/30 + 70;0.5T),131个钙化病变中有117个(89%)产生了信号差异。在这117个病变中,80个(61%)被MRI识别为钙化。大面积钙化(超过5mm)和高密度钙化(超过100Hu)比小面积或低密度钙化更常被识别。T2加权图像比其他序列更常显示钙化。使用传统脉冲序列时,钙化病变在MRI上常被识别为异常,但将其识别为钙化病变并不可靠。