Falkai Peter
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008 Aug;18 Suppl 3:S135-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.04.003. Epub 2008 May 27.
The results of recent studies, including the Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) study, the Cost Utility of the Latest Antipsychotic Drugs in Schizophrenia Study (CUtLASS), the European Schizophrenia Outpatient Health Outcome (SOHO), and the Spanish EFESO study have given some insight into why, in the course of real-world treatment, patients with schizophrenia discontinue or ask to be switched to other medications. Disappointingly, these studies consistently demonstrate that there is not one answer for these patients. The data from these studies indicate that an individual approach to treatment is required, and by doing this the need to adjust medications in advance of problems may be addressed. A combination of knowledge of the potential impact of each antipsychotic, typical or newer, alongside a more informed view of quality of life needs for these patients, might be useful to maximise treatment compliance of the currently available treatment options - with the potential for a not inconsiderable impact on efficacy in schizophrenia.
近期研究结果,包括干预有效性临床抗精神病药物试验(CATIE)研究、精神分裂症最新抗精神病药物成本效用研究(CUtLASS)、欧洲精神分裂症门诊健康结局(SOHO)研究以及西班牙EFESO研究,为理解在现实世界治疗过程中精神分裂症患者为何停药或要求换用其他药物提供了一些线索。令人失望的是,这些研究一致表明,对于这些患者没有一个统一的答案。这些研究数据表明,需要采取个体化治疗方法,这样做或许可以解决在问题出现之前调整药物的需求。了解每种典型或新型抗精神病药物的潜在影响,并结合对这些患者生活质量需求更深入的认识,可能有助于最大限度地提高当前可用治疗方案的治疗依从性——这对精神分裂症的疗效可能会产生相当大的影响。