Regional Medical Physics Department, Newcastle General Hospital, Newcastle, UK.
Int J Cosmet Sci. 1999 Oct;21(5):341-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-2494.1999.203163.x.
The photostabilities of four sunscreen products have been assessed in vitro by applying sunscreen to a substrate and measuring the spectral transmission prior to, and after exposure to a source of ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Results were independent of whether an application thickness of 1 or 2 mg/cm ; 2 was used, and whether the UV source was natural sunlight or a xenon arc solar-simulator. There were significant differences, however, between results obtained on a roughened quartz substrate and those obtained on excised human epidermis. It is unlikely that any substrate will give an exact representation of the in vivo situation and, indeed, both quartz and excised human epidermis have disadvantages associated with their use. However, the ranking of the four products in terms of their photostability was the same for both substrates. This implies that transmission spectroscopy, with either a quartz or a human epidermis substrate, can be used successfully to compare the photostabilities of different sunscreen products.
已通过将防晒霜涂于基质上,并在暴露于紫外(UV)辐射源之前和之后测量光谱透射率,对四种防晒霜产品的光稳定性进行了体外评估。结果与应用厚度为 1 或 2 mg/cm ; 2 无关,也与 UV 源是自然阳光还是氙弧太阳模拟器无关。但是,在粗糙石英基质上获得的结果与从切除的人体表皮上获得的结果之间存在显着差异。任何基质都不太可能准确地代表体内情况,实际上,石英和切除的人体表皮都有其使用相关的缺点。但是,这四种产品在光稳定性方面的排名对于两种基质都是相同的。这意味着,无论是使用石英还是人体表皮基质,通过透射光谱法都可以成功地比较不同防晒霜产品的光稳定性。