Suppr超能文献

使用项目反应理论方法对功能分期进行的探索性分析。

An exploratory analysis of functional staging using an item response theory approach.

作者信息

Tao Wei, Haley Stephen M, Coster Wendy J, Ni Pengsheng, Jette Alan M

机构信息

Health and Disability Research Institute, School of Public Health, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118-2639, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jun;89(6):1046-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.036.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and explore the feasibility of a functional staging system (defined as the process of assigning subjects, according to predetermined standards, into a set of hierarchic levels with regard to their functioning performance in mobility, daily activities, and cognitive skills) based on item response theory (IRT) methods using short forms of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) and to compare the criterion validity and sensitivity of the IRT-based staging system to a non-IRT-based staging system developed for the FIM instrument.

DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients interviewed at hospital discharge and 1, 6, and 12 months after inpatient rehabilitation.

SETTING

Follow-up interviews conducted in patients' homes.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of 516 patients (47% men; sample mean age, 68.3y) at baseline (retention at the final follow-up, 65%) with neurologic, lower-extremity orthopedic, or complex medical conditions.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

AM-PAC basic mobility, daily activity, and applied cognitive activity stages; FIM executive control, mobility, activities of daily living, and sphincter stages. Stages refer to the hierarchic levels assigned to patients' functioning performances.

RESULTS

We were able to define IRT-based staging definitions and create meaningful cut scores based on the 3 AM-PAC short forms. The IRT stages correlated as well or better to the criterion items than the FIM stages. Both the IRT-based stages and the FIM stages were sensitive to changes throughout the 6-month follow-up period. The FIM stages were more sensitive in detecting changes between baseline and 1-month follow-up visits. The AM-PAC stages were more discriminant in the follow-up visits.

CONCLUSIONS

An IRT-based staging approach appeared feasible and effective in classifying patients throughout long-term follow-up. Although these stages were developed from short forms, this staging methodology could also be applied to improve the meaning of scores generated from IRT-based computerized adaptive testing in future work.

摘要

目的

基于项目反应理论(IRT)方法,利用急性后期护理活动量表(AM-PAC)简表开发并探索一种功能分期系统(定义为根据预定标准,将受试者在移动性、日常活动和认知技能方面的功能表现划分为一组层次水平的过程)的可行性,并将基于IRT的分期系统与为FIM工具开发的非IRT分期系统的标准效度和敏感性进行比较。

设计

对出院时以及住院康复后1个月、6个月和12个月接受访谈的患者进行前瞻性纵向队列研究。

地点

在患者家中进行随访访谈。

参与者

516例患者的便利样本(47%为男性;样本平均年龄68.3岁),基线时患有神经疾病、下肢骨科疾病或复杂内科疾病(最终随访时的保留率为65%)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

AM-PAC基本移动性、日常活动和应用认知活动阶段;FIM执行控制、移动性、日常生活活动和括约肌阶段。阶段是指分配给患者功能表现的层次水平。

结果

我们能够基于3个AM-PAC简表定义基于IRT的分期定义并创建有意义的划界分数。IRT阶段与标准项目的相关性与FIM阶段相当或更好。基于IRT的阶段和FIM阶段在整个6个月的随访期内对变化均敏感。FIM阶段在检测基线和1个月随访之间的变化时更敏感。AM-PAC阶段在随访中更具区分性。

结论

基于IRT的分期方法在长期随访中对患者进行分类似乎是可行且有效的。尽管这些阶段是从简表中开发出来的,但这种分期方法也可应用于未来工作中,以改善基于IRT的计算机自适应测试所产生分数的意义。

相似文献

1
An exploratory analysis of functional staging using an item response theory approach.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jun;89(6):1046-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.036.
2
Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings.
J Rehabil Med. 2006 Jul;38(4):237-42. doi: 10.1080/16501970600609774.
3
Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;87(8):1033-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.020.
4
5
Measuring Mobility in Low Functioning Hospital Patients: An AM-PAC Replenishment Project.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jul;101(7):1144-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
6
Linking the activity measure for post acute care and the quality of life outcomes in neurological disorders.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10 Suppl):S37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.026.
7
Designing and implementing a system for tracking functional status after stroke: a feasibility study.
PM R. 2013 Jun;5(6):481-90; quiz 490. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.09.579. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
8
Validity and reliability of the FIM instrument in the inpatient burn rehabilitation population.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1521-1526.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.019. Epub 2013 Mar 5.
9
10
FIM-Minimum Data Set Motor Item Bank: Short Forms Development and Precision Comparison in Veterans.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Mar;99(3):534-541.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System.
Laryngoscope. 2022 Nov;132 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.30381. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
4
Identifying Clinically Relevant Functional Strata to Direct Mobility Preservation Among Patients Hospitalized With Medical Conditions.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5S):S78-S83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
A comparison of three methods in categorizing functional status to predict hospital readmission across post-acute care.
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232017. eCollection 2020.
7
Sensitivity of the SCI-FI/AT in Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1783-1788. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
9
Nested Cohort Study to Identify Characteristics That Predict Near-Term Disablement From Lung Cancer Brain Metastases.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):303-311.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.473. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
How Receptive Are Patients With Late Stage Cancer to Rehabilitation Services and What Are the Sources of Their Resistance?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.459. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Applying item response theory and computer adaptive testing: the challenges for health outcomes assessment.
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:187-94. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9197-1. Epub 2007 Apr 7.
3
The future of outcomes measurement: item banking, tailored short-forms, and computerized adaptive assessment.
Qual Life Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1:133-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9204-6. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
4
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC).
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;86(1):57-71. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21.
5
Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;87(8):1033-42. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.020.
6
Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings.
J Rehabil Med. 2006 Jul;38(4):237-42. doi: 10.1080/16501970600609774.
7
Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment.
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Nov;37(6):339-45. doi: 10.1080/16501970500302793.
9
Validity of functional independence staging in patients receiving rehabilitation in skilled nursing facilities.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jun;86(6):1095-101. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.035.
10
Development of an applied cognition scale to measure rehabilitation outcomes.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2030-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.05.002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验