• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性后期护理参与度测量工具(PM-PAC)的开发与初步心理测量评估

Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC).

作者信息

Gandek Barbara, Sinclair Samuel J, Jette Alan M, Ware John E

机构信息

All correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Barbara Gandek, MS, Health Assessment Lab, 275 Wyman Street, Suite 120, Waltham, MA 02451, USA.

出版信息

Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;86(1):57-71. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21.

DOI:10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21
PMID:17033591
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a patient-reported participation measure constructed within the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health.

DESIGN

The Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC) contains 51 items that assess participation in nine domains: mobility; role functioning; community, social, and civic life; domestic life/self-care; economic life; interpersonal relationships; communication; work; and education. Self-reported data were collected by interview with 395 noninstitutionalized rehabilitation patients. Psychometric analyses were conducted to test assumptions underlying the scaling and scoring of PM-PAC scales and to evaluate reliability and validity.

RESULTS

In general, analyses supported assignment of items to hypothesized scales. However, the community, social, and civic life, interpersonal relationships, and communication domains were highly correlated. Item response theory models indicated that items were directed primarily at people with worse than average limitations in participation than the average patient in this rehabilitation sample. Test and retest scale scores did not differ significantly (intraclass correlation coefficient range, 0.61-0.86). Groups with more severe conditions scored worse on PM-PAC scales, as hypothesized.

CONCLUSIONS

PM-PAC is a promising new measure of patient-reported participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Information about PM-PAC items from this study will be useful in developing a computerized, adaptive measure of participation.

摘要

目的

评估在《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》框架内构建的患者报告的参与度测量工具。

设计

急性后期护理参与度测量工具(PM-PAC)包含51个项目,用于评估九个领域的参与情况:活动能力;角色功能;社区、社会和公民生活;家庭生活/自我护理;经济生活;人际关系;沟通;工作;以及教育。通过对395名非机构化康复患者进行访谈收集自我报告数据。进行了心理测量分析,以检验PM-PAC量表的量表编制和评分所依据的假设,并评估其信度和效度。

结果

总体而言,分析支持将项目分配到假设的量表中。然而,社区、社会和公民生活、人际关系和沟通领域高度相关。项目反应理论模型表明,这些项目主要针对参与受限程度比该康复样本中的平均患者更差的人群。重测量表得分差异不显著(组内相关系数范围为0.61 - 0.86)。如假设的那样,病情更严重的组在PM-PAC量表上得分更低。

结论

PM-PAC是一种很有前景的新工具,用于测量《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》所定义的患者报告的参与度。本研究中关于PM-PAC项目的信息将有助于开发一种计算机化的、适应性的参与度测量工具。

相似文献

1
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for post-acute care (PM-PAC).急性后期护理参与度测量工具(PM-PAC)的开发与初步心理测量评估
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;86(1):57-71. doi: 10.1097/01.phm.0000233200.43822.21.
2
The development of an ICF-oriented, adaptive physician assessment instrument of mobility, self-care, and domestic life.一种以国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)为导向的、针对行动能力、自我护理和家庭生活的适应性医生评估工具的开发。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2009 Jun;32(2):98-107. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e3283112979.
3
Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Mobility Activities Measure for Inpatient Rehabilitation Settings (Mobam-in).住院康复环境移动活动测量量表(Mobam-in)的开发与初步心理测量学评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Dec;95(12):2367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.407. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
4
Activity outcome measurement for postacute care.急性后期护理的活动结果测量
Med Care. 2004 Jan;42(1 Suppl):I49-61. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000103520.43902.6c.
5
Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: II. Participation outcomes.住院康复出院后随访的计算机自适应测试:II. 参与结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Feb;89(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.150.
6
Psychometric properties of an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-oriented, adaptive questionnaire for the assessment of mobility, self-care and domestic life.一份以《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)为导向的适应性问卷的心理测量学特性,用于评估移动性、自我护理和家庭生活。
J Rehabil Med. 2007 Sep;39(7):537-46. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0083.
7
Development of a social inclusion index to capture subjective and objective life domains (Phase II): psychometric development study.发展一个社会包容指数来捕捉主观和客观的生活领域(第二阶段):心理测量发展研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(1):iii-vii, ix-xii, -1-241. doi: 10.3310/hta16010.
8
Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations.参与度调查/行动能力:一项针对行动不便和受限人群的参与度测量工具的心理测量特性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Feb;87(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.014.
9
A comparative review of contemporary participation measures' psychometric properties and content coverage.当代参与测量的心理计量学特性和内容覆盖面的比较综述。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9 Suppl):S17-28. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.07.011.
10
Development of the Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D): A New Outcome Measure for Rehabilitation.参与度测量-3领域、4维度(PM-3D4D)的开发:一种新的康复结局测量方法
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Feb;98(2):286-294. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.08.462. Epub 2016 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among people living with disabilities: A systematic review.改善残疾人户外出行能力的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 14;20(2):e1407. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1407. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
PROTOCOL: Interventions to improve outdoor mobility among adults with disability.方案:改善残疾成年人户外行动能力的干预措施。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 6;18(4):e1280. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1280. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
An Overview of Social Participation in Older Adults: Concepts and Assessments.
老年人社会参与概述:概念与评估
Phys Ther Res. 2021 Jul 13;24(2):85-97. doi: 10.1298/ptr.R0013. eCollection 2021.
4
Participation instruments in persons with spinal cord injury: A narrative review.脊髓损伤患者的参与工具:一项叙述性综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Jun 23;34:66. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.66. eCollection 2020.
5
Disability-Related Questions for Administrative Datasets.与残疾相关的行政数据集问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 28;17(15):5435. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155435.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the reintegration to normal living index into IGBO language among individuals with mobility disability.针对行动不便者,将正常生活重新融入指数进行跨文化调适并验证其在伊博语中的适用性。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Jul 12;3(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0139-9.
7
Are the Domains Considered by ICF Comprehensive Enough to Conceptualize Participation in the Patient with Hand Injuries?国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)所考虑的领域对于概念化手部损伤患者的参与度来说足够全面吗?
J Hand Microsurg. 2017 Dec;9(3):139-153. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608693. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
8
Measurement properties of a modified measure of participation for persons with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者参与度改良测量方法的测量属性
J Spinal Cord Med. 2016 Jul;39(4):476-83. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1157956. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
9
Assessment of physical function and participation in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT/OMERACT recommendations.慢性疼痛临床试验中身体功能与参与情况的评估:IMMPACT/OMERACT建议
Pain. 2016 Sep;157(9):1836-1850. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000577.
10
Exploring the Relation Between Impairment Rating by AMA Guide and Activity and Participation Based on ICF in the Patients with Hand Injuries.探讨AMA指南损伤评级与基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)的手部损伤患者活动与参与之间的关系。
J Hand Microsurg. 2015 Dec;7(2):261-7. doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0197-z. Epub 2015 Aug 12.