Kupka Ralph, Duffy Anne, Scott Jan, Almeida Jorge, Balanzá-Martínez Vicent, Birmaher Boris, Bond David J, Brietzke Elisa, Chendo Ines, Frey Benicio N, Grande Iria, Hafeman Danella, Hajek Tomas, Hillegers Manon, Kauer-Sant'Anna Marcia, Mansur Rodrigo B, van der Markt Afra, Post Robert, Tohen Mauricio, Tremain Hailey, Vazquez Gustavo, Vieta Eduard, Yatham Lakshmi N, Berk Michael, Alda Martin, Kapczinski Flávio
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Mental Health Research Insitute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Division of Student Mental Health, Queen's University, Cote Sharp Student Wellness Centre, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Bipolar Disord. 2021 Nov;23(7):659-678. doi: 10.1111/bdi.13105. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
Clinical staging is widely used in medicine to map disease progression, inform prognosis, and guide treatment decisions; in psychiatry, however, staging remains a hypothetical construct. To facilitate future research in bipolar disorders (BD), a well-defined nomenclature is needed, especially since diagnosis is often imprecise with blurred boundaries, and a full understanding of pathophysiology is lacking.
Under the auspices of the International Society of Bipolar Disorders, a Task Force of international experts was convened to review, discuss, and integrate findings from the scientific literature relevant to the development of a consensus staging model and standardize a terminology that could be used to advance future research including staging of BD and related disorders.
Consensus opinion and areas of uncertainty or difference were identified in regard to terms referring to staging as it may apply to BD, to at-risk status and subthreshold stages, and to various clinical stages of BD as it is currently diagnosed.
The use of a standardized nomenclature about the clinical stages of BD will facilitate communication about research on clinical and pathological components of this heterogeneous group of disorders. The concepts presented are based on current evidence, but the template provided allows for further refinements as etiological advances come to light.
临床分期在医学中被广泛用于描绘疾病进展、提供预后信息并指导治疗决策;然而在精神病学领域,分期仍是一个假设性的概念。为推动未来对双相情感障碍(BD)的研究,需要一个明确的命名法,尤其是鉴于诊断往往不准确且界限模糊,同时对病理生理学缺乏全面理解。
在国际双相情感障碍协会的支持下,召集了一个国际专家特别工作组,以审查、讨论并整合与共识分期模型发展相关的科学文献中的研究结果,并规范一种可用于推进未来研究(包括BD及相关障碍的分期)的术语。
就可能适用于BD的分期、风险状态和阈下阶段以及当前诊断的BD的各个临床阶段的术语,确定了共识意见以及不确定性或分歧领域。
使用关于BD临床阶段的标准化命名法将有助于就这一异质性疾病组的临床和病理成分的研究进行交流。所提出的概念基于当前证据,但随着病因学进展的出现,所提供的模板允许进一步完善。