Barboriak Daniel P, MacFall James R, Viglianti Benjamin L, Dewhirst Dvm Mark W
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):1388-98. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21344.
To compare the performance of three physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for predicting gadolinium contrast agent concentration-time curves (Gd-CTCs) obtained in superior sagittal sinus (SSS), cerebral cortex, and psoas muscle.
Three published whole-body PBPK models were modified to predict Gd-CTCs in normal-appearing tissue. The models differed in the number of organs modeled and total number of compartments, and were designated as the "well-mixed," "delay," and "dispersion" models. The suitability of the three models to predict Gd-CTC was studied using data from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion imaging obtained at 1.5T from 10 patients with glioblastoma multiforme and at 3.0T from five patients with liver metastases.
The dispersion model produced better fits than the delay model in the SSS (P < 0.0001) and cerebral cortex (P < 0.0001), and better fits than the well-mixed model in psoas muscle (P < 0.005). No model produced better fits than the dispersion model at any of the three locations.
In this evaluation, the dispersion model was most robust for prediction of Gd-CTCs derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. This represents a preliminary step in the development of a PBPK model useful for predicting Gd-CTCs at a time resolution appropriate for dynamic MRI applications.
比较三种基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型预测在矢状窦(SSS)、大脑皮层和腰大肌中获得的钆对比剂浓度-时间曲线(Gd-CTCs)的性能。
对三种已发表的全身PBPK模型进行修改,以预测正常组织中的Gd-CTCs。这些模型在建模的器官数量和隔室总数上有所不同,分别被指定为“充分混合”模型、“延迟”模型和“弥散”模型。使用来自10例多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者在1.5T时以及5例肝转移患者在3.0T时获得的动态对比增强磁共振灌注成像数据,研究这三种模型预测Gd-CTC的适用性。
在矢状窦(P < 0.0001)和大脑皮层(P < 0.0001)中,弥散模型的拟合效果优于延迟模型;在腰大肌中,弥散模型的拟合效果优于充分混合模型(P < 0.005)。在这三个位置中的任何一个位置,没有其他模型的拟合效果比弥散模型更好。
在本评估中,弥散模型在预测动态对比增强(DCE)-MRI得出的Gd-CTCs方面最为稳健。这代表了开发一个PBPK模型的初步步骤,该模型有助于以适合动态MRI应用的时间分辨率预测Gd-CTCs。