Suppr超能文献

三种基于生理的药代动力学模型用于预测动态磁共振成像测量的造影剂分布的比较。

Comparison of three physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for the prediction of contrast agent distribution measured by dynamic MR imaging.

作者信息

Barboriak Daniel P, MacFall James R, Viglianti Benjamin L, Dewhirst Dvm Mark W

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jun;27(6):1388-98. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21344.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the performance of three physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for predicting gadolinium contrast agent concentration-time curves (Gd-CTCs) obtained in superior sagittal sinus (SSS), cerebral cortex, and psoas muscle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three published whole-body PBPK models were modified to predict Gd-CTCs in normal-appearing tissue. The models differed in the number of organs modeled and total number of compartments, and were designated as the "well-mixed," "delay," and "dispersion" models. The suitability of the three models to predict Gd-CTC was studied using data from dynamic contrast-enhanced MR perfusion imaging obtained at 1.5T from 10 patients with glioblastoma multiforme and at 3.0T from five patients with liver metastases.

RESULTS

The dispersion model produced better fits than the delay model in the SSS (P < 0.0001) and cerebral cortex (P < 0.0001), and better fits than the well-mixed model in psoas muscle (P < 0.005). No model produced better fits than the dispersion model at any of the three locations.

CONCLUSION

In this evaluation, the dispersion model was most robust for prediction of Gd-CTCs derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. This represents a preliminary step in the development of a PBPK model useful for predicting Gd-CTCs at a time resolution appropriate for dynamic MRI applications.

摘要

目的

比较三种基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型预测在矢状窦(SSS)、大脑皮层和腰大肌中获得的钆对比剂浓度-时间曲线(Gd-CTCs)的性能。

材料与方法

对三种已发表的全身PBPK模型进行修改,以预测正常组织中的Gd-CTCs。这些模型在建模的器官数量和隔室总数上有所不同,分别被指定为“充分混合”模型、“延迟”模型和“弥散”模型。使用来自10例多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者在1.5T时以及5例肝转移患者在3.0T时获得的动态对比增强磁共振灌注成像数据,研究这三种模型预测Gd-CTC的适用性。

结果

在矢状窦(P < 0.0001)和大脑皮层(P < 0.0001)中,弥散模型的拟合效果优于延迟模型;在腰大肌中,弥散模型的拟合效果优于充分混合模型(P < 0.005)。在这三个位置中的任何一个位置,没有其他模型的拟合效果比弥散模型更好。

结论

在本评估中,弥散模型在预测动态对比增强(DCE)-MRI得出的Gd-CTCs方面最为稳健。这代表了开发一个PBPK模型的初步步骤,该模型有助于以适合动态MRI应用的时间分辨率预测Gd-CTCs。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Cardiotoxicity induced by chemotherapy and antibody therapy.化疗和抗体治疗引起的心脏毒性。
Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:485-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.57.121304.131240.
9
The mean and standard deviation: what does it all mean?均值与标准差:这一切意味着什么?
J Surg Res. 2004 Jun 15;119(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2004.02.008.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验