• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲心脏病专家、内科医生、老年病医生和初级保健医生对心力衰竭的认知与看法。

Awareness and perception of heart failure among European cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, and primary care physicians.

作者信息

Remme Willem J, McMurray John J V, Hobbs F D Richard, Cohen-Solal Alain, Lopez-Sendon José, Boccanelli Alessandro, Zannad Faiez, Rauch Bernhard, Keukelaar Karen, Macarie Cezar, Ruzyllo Witold, Cline Charles

机构信息

Sticares Cardiovascular Research Foundation, PO Box 882, 3160 AB Rhoon, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2008 Jul;29(14):1739-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn196. Epub 2008 May 27.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn196
PMID:18506054
Abstract

AIMS

To assess awareness of heart failure (HF) management recommendations in Europe among cardiologists (C), internists and geriatricians (I/G), and primary care physicians (PCPs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Study group on HF Awareness and Perception in Europe (SHAPE) surveyed randomly selected C (2041), I/G (1881), and PCP (2965) in France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. Each physician completed a 32-item questionnaire about the diagnosis and treatment of HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <40%). This report provides an analysis of HF awareness among C, I/G, and PCP. Seventy-one per cent I/G and 92% C use echocardiography, and 43% I/G and 82% C use echo-Doppler as a routine diagnostic test (both P < 0.0001). In contrast, 75% PCP use signs and symptoms to diagnose HF. Fewer I/G would use an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor in >90% of their patients (64 vs. 82% C, P < 0.0001), whereas only 47% PCP would routinely prescribe an ACE-inhibitor. Worsening HF was considered a risk of ACE-inhibitor therapy by 35% PCP. I/G and PCP consistently do not prescribe target ACE-inhibitor doses (P < 0.0001 vs. C). Only 39% I/G would use a beta-blocker in >50% of their patients (vs. 73% C, P < 0.0001). Also, only 5% PCP would always, and 35% often, prescribe a beta-blocker and reach target doses in only 7-29%. Moreover, 34% PCP and 26% I/G vs. 11% C (P < 0.0001) do not start a beta-blocker in patients with mild HF, who are already on an ACE-inhibitor and are on diuretic. In mild, stable HF, 39% PCP and 18% I/G would only prescribe diuretics, vs. 7% C (P < 0.0001). In patients with worsening HF in sinus rhythm and on an optimal ACE-inhibitor, beta-blockade and diuretics, significantly more C would add spironolactone, but I/G would more often add digoxin.

CONCLUSION

Although each physician group lacks complete adherence to guideline-recommended management strategies, these are used significantly less well by I, G, and PCPs, indicating the need for education of these essential healthcare providers.

摘要

目的

评估欧洲心脏病专家(C)、内科医生和老年病医生(I/G)以及初级保健医生(PCP)对心力衰竭(HF)管理建议的知晓情况。

方法与结果

欧洲HF知晓与认知研究组(SHAPE)对法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、波兰、罗马尼亚、西班牙、瑞典和英国随机抽取的心脏病专家(2041名)、内科医生和老年病医生(1881名)以及初级保健医生(2965名)进行了调查。每位医生完成了一份关于HF(左心室射血分数<40%)诊断和治疗的32项问卷。本报告分析了心脏病专家、内科医生和老年病医生以及初级保健医生对HF的知晓情况。71%的内科医生和老年病医生以及92%的心脏病专家使用超声心动图,43%的内科医生和老年病医生以及82%的心脏病专家将超声多普勒作为常规诊断测试(两者P<0.0001)。相比之下,75%的初级保健医生使用体征和症状来诊断HF。在内科医生和老年病医生中,愿意在90%以上患者中使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂的人数较少(64%对82%的心脏病专家,P<0.0001),而只有47%的初级保健医生会常规开具ACE抑制剂。35%的初级保健医生认为HF恶化是ACE抑制剂治疗的风险。内科医生和老年病医生以及初级保健医生一直未按照目标剂量开具ACE抑制剂(与心脏病专家相比,P<0.0001)。只有39%的内科医生和老年病医生会在50%以上患者中使用β受体阻滞剂(与73%的心脏病专家相比,P<0.0001)。此外,只有5%的初级保健医生会始终开具β受体阻滞剂,35%的初级保健医生经常开具,且只有7%-29%的患者能达到目标剂量。此外,在已经服用ACE抑制剂且正在服用利尿剂的轻度HF患者中,34%的初级保健医生和26%的内科医生和老年病医生不会起始使用β受体阻滞剂,而心脏病专家中这一比例为11%(P<0.0001)。在轻度、稳定的HF患者中,39%的初级保健医生和18%的内科医生和老年病医生只会开具利尿剂,而心脏病专家中这一比例为7%(P<0.0001)。在窦性心律且服用最佳剂量ACE抑制剂、β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂的HF恶化患者中,显著更多的心脏病专家会加用螺内酯,但内科医生和老年病医生更常加用地高辛。

结论

尽管每个医生群体都未完全遵循指南推荐的管理策略,但内科医生、老年病医生和初级保健医生对这些策略的使用明显较差,这表明需要对这些重要的医疗保健提供者进行教育。

相似文献

1
Awareness and perception of heart failure among European cardiologists, internists, geriatricians, and primary care physicians.欧洲心脏病专家、内科医生、老年病医生和初级保健医生对心力衰竭的认知与看法。
Eur Heart J. 2008 Jul;29(14):1739-52. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn196. Epub 2008 May 27.
2
Optimization of heart FailUre medical Treatment after hospital discharge according to left ventricUlaR Ejection fraction: the FUTURE survey.根据左心室射血分数优化心力衰竭出院后的医疗治疗:FUTURE 调查。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jun-Jul;105(6-7):355-65. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2012.04.003. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
3
Differences between cardiologists and internists in the management of heart failure. Medical guidelines compared with every-day practice.心脏病专家和内科医生在心力衰竭管理方面的差异。医学指南与日常实践的比较。
Kardiol Pol. 2004 Nov;61(11):431-9; discussion 440-1.
4
Adherence to guidelines is a predictor of outcome in chronic heart failure: the MAHLER survey.遵循指南是慢性心力衰竭预后的一个预测指标:MAHLER调查。
Eur Heart J. 2005 Aug;26(16):1653-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi251. Epub 2005 Apr 12.
5
Adherence to guidelines for patients hospitalized with heart failure: a nationwide survey.心力衰竭住院患者对指南的遵循情况:一项全国性调查。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2006 Dec;8(12):875-9.
6
Factors influencing medical treatment of heart failure patients in Spanish internal medicine departments: a national survey.西班牙内科科室中心力衰竭患者的药物治疗影响因素:一项全国性调查。
QJM. 2005 Feb;98(2):127-38. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci019. Epub 2005 Jan 17.
7
European survey of primary care physician perceptions on heart failure diagnosis and management (Euro-HF).欧洲初级保健医生对心力衰竭诊断和管理的认知调查(欧洲心力衰竭调查)
Eur Heart J. 2000 Nov;21(22):1877-87. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2170.
8
The impact of patient-specific quality-of-care report cards on guideline adherence in heart failure.特定患者的医疗质量报告卡对心力衰竭指南依从性的影响。
Am Heart J. 2007 Dec;154(6):1174-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.08.007. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
9
Physician specialty and quality of care for CHF: different patients or different patterns of practice?医生专业与慢性心力衰竭的医疗质量:不同的患者还是不同的医疗模式?
Can J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 31;19(4):371-7.
10
Under-utilization of evidence-based drug treatment in patients with heart failure is only partially explained by dissimilarity to patients enrolled in landmark trials: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Heart Failure.心力衰竭患者对循证药物治疗的利用不足,部分原因是与纳入标志性试验的患者存在差异:来自欧洲心力衰竭调查的一份报告。
Eur Heart J. 2005 Dec;26(24):2706-13. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi499. Epub 2005 Sep 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Rurality, travel distance, and effectiveness of remote patient management in patients with heart failure in the TIM-HF2 trial in Germany: a pre-specified analysis of an open-label, randomised controlled trial.德国TIM-HF2试验中农村地区、就诊距离与心力衰竭患者远程患者管理的有效性:一项开放标签随机对照试验的预先指定分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 18;54:101321. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101321. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Incident heart failure: comparing management and outcome in primary and hospital settings in Western Sweden 2008-2017.新发心力衰竭:2008 - 2017年瑞典西部基层和医院环境下的管理与结局比较
ESC Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;12(2):832-838. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14999. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
Comparing the diagnostic considerations between general practitioners with a special interest in cardiovascular disease and those without in patients with symptoms suggestive of heart failure: a vignette study.
比较对有心血管疾病专业兴趣的全科医生和无心血管疾病专业兴趣的全科医生在有疑似心力衰竭症状的患者中的诊断注意事项:病例研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 14;25(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02466-6.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on implementation of novel guideline-directed medical therapies for heart failure in Germany: a nationwide retrospective analysis.新冠疫情对德国心力衰竭新型指南导向药物治疗实施情况的影响:一项全国性回顾性分析
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Nov 7;35:100778. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100778. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Preferences for deprescribing antihypertensive medications amongst clinicians, carers and people living with dementia: a discrete choice experiment.降压药物停药偏好研究:临床医生、护理人员和痴呆症患者的离散选择实验。
Age Ageing. 2023 Aug 1;52(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad153.
6
Patient profile and outcomes associated with follow-up in specialty vs. primary care in heart failure.心力衰竭患者在专科与初级保健随访中的特征和结局。
ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Apr;9(2):822-833. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13848. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
7
A Combination of Chest Radiography and Estimated Plasma Volume May Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Acute Heart Failure.胸部X线检查与估计血浆容量相结合可能预测急性心力衰竭患者的院内死亡率。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 11;8:752915. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.752915. eCollection 2021.
8
Perceived risk profile and treatment optimization in heart failure: an analysis from BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in chronic heart failure.心力衰竭中的感知风险概况和治疗优化:来自 BIOlogy 研究以优化慢性心力衰竭个体化治疗的分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jun;44(6):780-788. doi: 10.1002/clc.23576. Epub 2021 May 7.
9
Good performance in the management of acute heart failure in cardiogeriatric departments: the ICREX-94 experience.心内科老年病科室在急性心力衰竭管理方面表现良好:ICREX-94 经验。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 1;21(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02210-0.
10
Physician Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.医生对射血分数保留的心力衰竭的诊断和管理的观点
CJC Open. 2020 Nov 16;3(3):361-366. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.11.008. eCollection 2021 Mar.