• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[经Delorme技术和直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂]

[Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse by the Delorme technique and rectopexy].

作者信息

Fang Chia Bin, Candelária Paulo de Azeredo Passos, Klug Wilmar Artur, Capelhuchnik Peretz

机构信息

Departamento de Cirurgia da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2008 Mar-Apr;54(2):142-5. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302008000200017.

DOI:10.1590/s0104-42302008000200017
PMID:18506323
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rectopexy is the most common technique used to correct rectal prolapse. Perineal procedures such as the Delorme technique and others are employed for older frail patients with significant comorbidity because of the higher recurrence rate. This study evaluated results of the Delorme technique and rectopexy.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 31 patients with rectal prolapse treated from 1997 to 2005. Among them, 15 patients (group A) were treated by rectopexy and 16 by the Delorme technique (group B). Analysis of hospital stay, morbidity, complications and recurrence rate was carried out.

RESULTS

There was longer hospital stay, seven days (3 to 11days) in group A, compared to four days (2 to 6 days) in group B. Recurrence rate was similar, respectively 13.3% and 6.6% (not significant). Most patients presented low rest and squeezing pressure, although half of them became fully continent after surgery (group A=53% and group B =50%). Morbidity was 40% and 18.9%, respectively for groups A and B. Sacral hemorrhage occurred in one patient and was controlled during rectopexy. A case of bleeding occurred in group B and ceased spontaneously without surgical procedure. There was a rectal stricture in group B treated successfully with digital dilatation at the doctor's office.

CONCLUSION

The Delorme technique for treatment of rectal prolapse is a safe procedure and presents results similar to rectopexy. In addition it also has lower morbidity, and could be more often indicated.

摘要

目的

直肠固定术是纠正直肠脱垂最常用的技术。由于复发率较高,会阴手术如德洛姆技术等用于患有严重合并症的老年体弱患者。本研究评估了德洛姆技术和直肠固定术的效果。

方法

对1997年至2005年治疗的31例直肠脱垂患者进行回顾性研究。其中,15例患者(A组)接受直肠固定术治疗,16例接受德洛姆技术治疗(B组)。对住院时间、发病率、并发症和复发率进行分析。

结果

A组住院时间较长,为7天(3至11天),而B组为4天(2至6天)。复发率相似,分别为13.3%和6.6%(无显著性差异)。大多数患者静息和挤压压力较低,尽管其中一半患者术后完全控便(A组=53%,B组=50%)。A组和B组的发病率分别为40%和18.9%。1例患者在直肠固定术中出现骶部出血并得到控制。B组有1例出血病例,未经手术自行停止。B组有1例直肠狭窄,在医生办公室通过手指扩张成功治疗。

结论

德洛姆技术治疗直肠脱垂是一种安全的手术,效果与直肠固定术相似。此外,其发病率较低,可更频繁地应用。

相似文献

1
[Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse by the Delorme technique and rectopexy].[经Delorme技术和直肠固定术治疗直肠脱垂]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2008 Mar-Apr;54(2):142-5. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302008000200017.
2
Comparing perineal repairs for rectal prolapse: Delorme versus Altemeier.直肠脱垂会阴修补术的比较:德洛姆术式与阿尔特迈尔术式
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Sep;19(9):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1337-y. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
3
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study.腹腔镜下腹膜网片直肠固定术与德洛姆手术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的前瞻性随机研究
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan;19(1):50-57. doi: 10.1111/codi.13399.
4
Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Wells Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Long-Term Results.腹腔镜腹侧直肠固定术与腹腔镜韦尔斯直肠固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0012. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
5
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in male patients with external rectal prolapse is associated with a high reoperation rate.男性直肠外脱垂患者行腹腔镜腹侧直肠固定术的再手术率较高。
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Oct;20(10):715-20. doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1528-1. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
6
Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse.不切除的腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术是治疗全层直肠脱垂的有效方法。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 May;43(5):638-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02235579.
7
Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Persistent Rectal Prolapse in Children: Is It a Safe and Effective First-Line Intervention?腹腔镜缝合直肠固定术治疗儿童持续性直肠脱垂:它是一种安全有效的一线干预措施吗?
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Apr;26(4):324-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0250. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
8
Laparoscopic rectal prolapse surgery combined with short hospital stay is safe in elderly and debilitated patients.腹腔镜直肠脱垂手术联合短期住院治疗对老年体弱患者是安全的。
Surg Endosc. 2006 Sep;20(9):1353-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0217-3. Epub 2006 May 13.
9
[Efficacy analysis of Altemeier and Delorme procedures for the rectal prolapse].[Altemeier术式与Delorme术式治疗直肠脱垂的疗效分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec 25;22(12):1170-1176. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.12.013.
10
Surgical management of rectal prolapse.直肠脱垂的外科治疗
Arch Surg. 2005 Jan;140(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.1.63.

引用本文的文献

1
Complete rectal prolapse in adults: clinical and functional results of Delrome procedure combined with postanal repair.成人完全性直肠脱垂:Delorme手术联合肛门后修复术的临床及功能结果
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2011 Jul;5(2 Suppl 1):37-9.
2
Complete rectal prolapse in adults: clinical and functional results of delorme procedure combined with postanal repair.成人完全性直肠脱垂:Delorme手术联合肛门后修复术的临床及功能结果
Indian J Surg. 2010 Dec;72(6):443-7. doi: 10.1007/s12262-010-0165-6. Epub 2010 Nov 18.