• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尺寸真的很重要吗?基于尺寸对Riata导线系列进行比较及其与性能的关系。

Does size really matter? A comparison of the Riata lead family based on size and its relation to performance.

作者信息

Corbisiero Raffaele, Armbruster Rebecca

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Electrophysiology Division, Deborah Heart and Lung Center, Browns Mills, New Jersey 08015, USA.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jun;31(6):722-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01076.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01076.x
PMID:18507545
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, the performance and safety of smaller diameter implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads has been questioned. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the impact of size on lead performance and perforation rates by comparing the performance of 7 French (7F) and 8 French (8F) leads with similar design characteristics implanted by a single operator.

METHODS

Patients implanted with a Riata 1580 (8F) or 7000 (7F) series leads (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) over a 2-year period were evaluated to compare performance and perforation rates.

RESULTS

There were 357 Riata 8F leads and 357 Riata 7F leads implanted in 714 patients. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 24 months. The 8F leads were implanted in the right ventricular apex more often than were 7F leads (129 or 37% vs 72 or 20%, P < 0.0001). Oversensing that did not result in therapy occurred in 2 pts (0.56%) with 8F leads and 1 pt. (0.28%) with a 7F lead (P = 0.56). Oversensing with therapy occurred once in both groups (0.28%, P = NS). One perforation occurred in each group (0.28%, P = NS). Both occurred in leads that were implanted in the right ventricular apex (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of St. Jude Medical 7F and 8F Riata leads was similar. The incidence of lead-related adverse events was within or below the low end of published acceptable ranges for ICD lead perforation and sensing anomalies. Perforations were less likely to occur in leads that were implanted in nonapical positions.

摘要

背景

最近,较小直径的植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)导线的性能和安全性受到质疑。本分析的目的是通过比较由单一操作者植入的具有相似设计特征的7F和8F导线的性能,来确定尺寸对导线性能和穿孔率的影响。

方法

对在2年期间植入Riata 1580(8F)或7000(7F)系列导线(美国加利福尼亚州西尔玛市圣犹达医疗公司)的患者进行评估,以比较性能和穿孔率。

结果

714例患者中植入了357根Riata 8F导线和357根Riata 7F导线。随访时间为1至24个月。8F导线比7F导线更常植入右心室心尖(129例或37%对72例或20%,P<0.0001)。8F导线组有2例患者(0.56%)出现未导致治疗的过感知,7F导线组有1例患者(0.28%)出现过感知(P = 0.56)。两组均有1例出现导致治疗的过感知(0.28%,P = 无显著性差异)。每组均发生1例穿孔(0.28%,P = 无显著性差异)。两者均发生在植入右心室心尖的导线中(P = 0.02)。

结论

圣犹达医疗公司的7F和8F Riata导线性能相似。导线相关不良事件的发生率在已发表的ICD导线穿孔和感知异常可接受范围的低端或以下。非心尖位置植入的导线发生穿孔的可能性较小。

相似文献

1
Does size really matter? A comparison of the Riata lead family based on size and its relation to performance.尺寸真的很重要吗?基于尺寸对Riata导线系列进行比较及其与性能的关系。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Jun;31(6):722-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01076.x.
2
Update on small-diameter implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads performance.小直径植入式心脏复律除颤器导线性能的最新进展。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):652-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03338.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
3
Delayed ICD lead cardiac perforation: comparison of small versus standard-diameter leads implanted in a single center.植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)导线延迟性心脏穿孔:单中心植入的小直径与标准直径导线的比较
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr;34(4):475-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.03002.x. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
4
Rates and severity of perforation from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a 4-year study.植入式心脏复律除颤器导线穿孔的发生率及严重程度:一项为期4年的研究。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009 Jan;24(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s10840-008-9308-0. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
5
Performance of dedicated versus integrated bipolar defibrillator leads with CRT-defibrillators: results from a Prospective Multicenter Study.带有心脏再同步化治疗除颤器(CRT-D)的专用双极与集成双极除颤器导线的性能:一项前瞻性多中心研究的结果
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 Feb;32(2):157-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02197.x.
6
Risk of failure of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads.经静脉植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的故障风险。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009 Aug;2(4):411-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.108.834093. Epub 2009 Apr 17.
7
Failure of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads: a matter of lead size?植入式心脏复律除颤器导线故障:导线尺寸的问题?
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Feb;10(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.10.017. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
8
Clinical performance of the St. Jude Medical Riata defibrillation lead in a large patient population.圣犹达医疗 Riata 除颤导联在大型患者群体中的临床性能。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 May;21(5):551-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01651.x. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
9
Clinical experience and procedural outcomes associated with the DF4 implantable cardioverter defibrillator system: the SJ4 postapproval study.DF4植入式心脏复律除颤器系统的临床经验及手术结果:SJ4批准后研究
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013 Jul;36(7):855-62. doi: 10.1111/pace.12130. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
Sensing failure associated with the Medtronic Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead.与美敦力Sprint Fidelis除颤器导线相关的感知故障。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Mar;19(3):270-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01058.x. Epub 2007 Dec 20.