• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创建跨学科研究联盟以推动护理科学发展。

Creating cross-disciplinary research alliances to advance nursing science.

作者信息

Loeb Susan J, Penrod Janice, Kolanowski Ann, Hupcey Judith E, Haidet Kim Kopenhaver, Fick Donna M, McGonigle Dee, Yu Fang

机构信息

College of Health & Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(2):195-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00226.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00226.x
PMID:18507576
Abstract

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the utility of a developmental approach to building and sustaining cross-disciplinary research alliances.

ORGANIZING CONSTRUCT

Cross-disciplinary collaborations offer great promise for advancing an evolving program of research. Funding agencies' commitment to interdisciplinary work further heightens these collaborations. Nurse researchers, however, are not necessarily equipped with the knowledge and skills needed to strategically and successfully build and maintain cross-disciplinary collaborations.

METHODS

Successful strategies for forging, extending, and sustaining alliances are organized using a developmental approach and illustrated by exemplars.

FINDINGS

The initial phase of forging alliances is focused on creating a limited network to support relatively clear-cut research goals. The cohesive cross-disciplinary team is subsequently extended beyond the initial team to strategically address broader research goals. As the team matures, emphasis shifts toward sustaining the team through shared leadership that more actively focuses on the development of the field than the development of individual programs of research.

CONCLUSIONS

The advancement of nursing science requires nurse researchers to rethink the developmental phases of building appropriate research teams. Strategic approaches for forging, extending, and sustaining cross-disciplinary alliances position nurse researchers as leaders in innovative cross-disciplinary research. The development of cross-disciplinary teams supports translational research and, by extension, the science that undergirds practice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Research that reflects cross-disciplinary perspectives is particularly well suited to addressing the complex health issues encountered by patients, families, and communities.

摘要

目的

展示一种发展性方法在建立和维持跨学科研究联盟中的作用。

组织架构

跨学科合作对于推进不断发展的研究项目具有巨大潜力。资助机构对跨学科工作的支持进一步加强了这些合作。然而,护士研究人员不一定具备战略性地成功建立和维持跨学科合作所需的知识和技能。

方法

运用发展性方法组织建立、扩展和维持联盟的成功策略,并通过实例进行说明。

研究结果

建立联盟的初始阶段侧重于创建一个有限的网络,以支持相对明确的研究目标。随后,具有凝聚力的跨学科团队会从最初的团队扩展,以战略性地应对更广泛的研究目标。随着团队的成熟,重点转向通过共享领导来维持团队,这种领导更积极地关注领域的发展而非单个研究项目的发展。

结论

护理科学的进步要求护士研究人员重新思考建立合适研究团队的发展阶段。建立、扩展和维持跨学科联盟的战略方法使护士研究人员成为创新跨学科研究的领导者。跨学科团队的发展支持转化研究,进而支持指导实践的科学。

临床意义

反映跨学科观点的研究特别适合解决患者、家庭和社区遇到的复杂健康问题。

相似文献

1
Creating cross-disciplinary research alliances to advance nursing science.创建跨学科研究联盟以推动护理科学发展。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2008;40(2):195-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2008.00226.x.
2
Enhancing multiple disciplinary teamwork.加强多学科团队合作。
Nurs Outlook. 2008 May-Jun;56(3):108-114.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.013.
3
Lonergan's philosophy as grounding for cross-disciplinary research.作为跨学科研究基础的隆纳根哲学。
Nurs Philos. 2014 Apr;15(2):125-37. doi: 10.1111/nup.12024.
4
Strengthening Inter- and Intraprofessional Collaborations to Advance Biobehavioral Symptom Science.加强跨专业和专业内合作,推进生物行为症状科学。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Jan;51(1):9-16. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12456. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
5
Solving challenges in inter- and trans-disciplinary working teams: Lessons from the surgical technology field.解决跨学科和跨领域工作团队中的挑战:来自外科技术领域的经验教训。
Artif Intell Med. 2015 Mar;63(3):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
6
National Institute of Nursing Research Centers of Excellence: a logic model for sustainability, leveraging resources, and collaboration to accelerate cross-disciplinary science.美国国立护理研究卓越中心:一个关于可持续性、利用资源及合作以加速跨学科科学发展的逻辑模型
Nurs Outlook. 2014 Nov-Dec;62(6):384-93. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
7
[Cross-Disciplinary Research in Nursing: Competency and Practice].[护理领域的跨学科研究:能力与实践]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2021 Jun;68(3):90-96. doi: 10.6224/JN.202106_68(3).12.
8
Team models in neurorehabilitation: structure, function, and culture change.神经康复中的团队模式:结构、功能与文化变革。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(4):655-69. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141080.
9
Designing a CTSA-Based Social Network Intervention to Foster Cross-Disciplinary Team Science.设计基于临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)的社交网络干预措施以促进跨学科团队科学
Clin Transl Sci. 2015 Aug;8(4):281-9. doi: 10.1111/cts.12267. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
Group Development and Integration in a Cross-Disciplinary and Intercultural Research Team.跨学科和跨文化研究团队中的团队发展与整合
Environ Manage. 2017 Apr;59(4):665-683. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0809-9. Epub 2017 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Clinical Practices: A Cross-Disciplinary Review of Nursing, Pharmacy, and Medical Science Contributions.临床实践的进展:护理、药学和医学贡献的跨学科综述
Cureus. 2025 Jun 20;17(6):e86408. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86408. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Common criteria for evaluating cross-disciplinary research in global health: a scoping review.全球卫生领域跨学科研究评估的通用标准:一项范围综述
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 6;2(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00113-x.
3
Challenges for research uptake for health policymaking and practice in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.
低中等收入国家健康政策制定与实践研究转化面临的挑战:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 6;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01084-5.
4
Barriers to and Strategies for Gaining Entry to Correctional Settings for Health Research.进入惩教设施进行健康研究的障碍及策略。
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2020 Mar;33(1):71-80. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2020.26190.
5
Practical actions for fostering cross-disciplinary global health research: lessons from a narrative literature review.促进跨学科全球健康研究的实用行动:叙事文献回顾的经验教训。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Apr;5(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002293.
6
Global health research case studies: lessons from partnerships addressing health inequities.全球卫生研究案例研究:解决卫生不平等问题的伙伴关系带来的经验教训。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2011 Nov 8;11 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S2. doi: 10.1186/1472-698X-11-S2-S2.
7
Conducting HIV research in racial and ethnic minority communities: building a successful interdisciplinary research team.在种族和少数民族社区开展艾滋病毒研究:建立一个成功的跨学科研究团队。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2010.10.008. Epub 2011 Feb 1.