• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加强多学科团队合作。

Enhancing multiple disciplinary teamwork.

作者信息

Weaver Terri E

机构信息

Biobehavioral and Health Sciences Division, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6096, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Outlook. 2008 May-Jun;56(3):108-114.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.013
PMID:18501748
Abstract

Multiple disciplinary research provides an opportunity to bring together investigators across disciplines to provide new views and develop innovative approaches to important questions. Through this shared experience, novel paradigms are formed, original frameworks are developed, and new language is generated. Integral to the successful construction of effective cross-disciplinary teams is the recognition of antecedent factors that affect the development of the team such as intrapersonal, social, physical environmental, organizational, and institutional influences. Team functioning is enhanced with well-developed behavioral, affective, interpersonal, and intellectual processes. Outcomes of effective multiple disciplinary research teams include novel ideas, integrative models, new training programs, institutional change, and innovative policies that can also influence the degree to which antecedents and processes contribute to team performance. Ongoing evaluation of team functioning and achievement of designated outcomes ensures the continued development of the multiple disciplinary team and confirmation of this approach as important to the advancement of science.

摘要

多学科研究提供了一个机会,让不同学科的研究人员汇聚在一起,以提供新的观点,并针对重要问题开发创新方法。通过这种共享经验,形成了新的范式,开发了原创框架,并产生了新的术语。成功组建有效的跨学科团队不可或缺的一点是,要认识到影响团队发展的先行因素,如个人、社会、物理环境、组织和制度等方面的影响。通过完善的行为、情感、人际和智力过程,可以提升团队的运作效率。有效的多学科研究团队的成果包括新颖的想法、综合模型、新的培训项目、制度变革以及创新政策,这些成果也会影响先行因素和过程对团队绩效的贡献程度。对团队运作和指定成果达成情况进行持续评估,可确保多学科团队持续发展,并确认这种方法对科学进步至关重要。

相似文献

1
Enhancing multiple disciplinary teamwork.加强多学科团队合作。
Nurs Outlook. 2008 May-Jun;56(3):108-114.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.03.013.
2
Interdisciplinary researching: exploring the opportunities and risks of working together.跨学科研究:探索合作的机遇与风险。
Nurs Health Sci. 2006 Jun;8(2):88-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2006.00257.x.
3
Reducing the failure risk of interdisciplinary healthcare teams.降低跨学科医疗团队的失败风险。
Crit Care Nurs Q. 2009 Apr-Jun;32(2):81-8. doi: 10.1097/CNQ.0b013e3181a27af2.
4
[Role of the interdisciplinary team in care].跨学科团队在护理中的作用
Rech Soins Infirm. 2004 Dec(79):12-8.
5
What's in a name? Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary.名字里有什么?多学科、跨学科和超学科。
J Prof Nurs. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(6):332-4. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2005.10.009.
6
Interdisciplinary collaboration for healthcare professionals.医疗保健专业人员的跨学科合作。
Nurs Adm Q. 2008 Jan-Mar;32(1):40-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000305946.31193.61.
7
The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration.团队科学的生态学:理解跨学科合作的情境影响
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2 Suppl):S96-115. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.003.
8
[Sociology and nursing science: reflections on an interdisciplinary approach].[社会学与护理科学:对跨学科方法的思考]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2004 Dec(79):58-67.
9
Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature.医疗保健动态领域中的团队合作与患者安全:文献综述
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009 Feb;53(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x.
10
Assessing the performance of surgical teams.评估手术团队的表现。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342977.84307.64.

引用本文的文献

1
Teams in Transition: A Three-Wave Longitudinal Study of Reflection, Implicit and Explicit Coordination and Performance Improvements.处于转型期的团队:一项关于反思、隐性与显性协调及绩效提升的三波纵向研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 7;12:677896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.677896. eCollection 2021.
2
Why and When Team Reflexivity Contributes to Team Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model.团队反思性为何以及何时有助于团队绩效:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 21;10:3044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03044. eCollection 2019.
3
Unpacking Partnership, Engagement, and Collaboration Research to Inform Implementation Strategies Development: Theoretical Frameworks and Emerging Methodologies.
剖析伙伴关系、参与和合作研究以指导实施策略制定:理论框架与新兴方法
Front Public Health. 2018 Jul 11;6:190. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00190. eCollection 2018.
4
Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: a scoping review and domain analysis.科学知识生产团队中合作准备度的个体动机和威胁指标:一项范围综述与领域分析
Heliyon. 2016 May;2(5). doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00105.
5
Interdisciplinary collaboration applied to clinical research: an example of remote monitoring in lung transplantation.跨学科合作应用于临床研究:肺移植远程监测实例
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;31(3):202-10. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0b013e31824e0307.
6
Evaluating a team-based approach to research capacity building using a matched-pairs study design.使用配对研究设计评估基于团队的研究能力建设方法。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 12;13:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-16.
7
Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary facial function clinic.多学科面部功能诊所的疗效。
Eye (Lond). 2011 Oct;25(10):1360-4. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.183. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
8
Team process in community-based participatory research on maternity care in the Dominican Republic.团队在多米尼加共和国母婴保健的社区参与式研究中的作用。
Nurs Inq. 2010 Dec;17(4):309-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2010.00514.x.
9
Consideration of shared decision making in nursing: a review of clinicians' perceptions and interventions.护理中共同决策的考量:临床医生认知与干预的综述
Open Nurs J. 2009 Oct 2;3:65-75. doi: 10.2174/1874434600903010065.