Suppr超能文献

肟类药物对神经毒剂疗效差异的构效关系分析

A structure-activity analysis of the variation in oxime efficacy against nerve agents.

作者信息

Maxwell Donald M, Koplovitz Irwin, Worek Franz, Sweeney Richard E

机构信息

US Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense, Research Division, Pharmacology Branch, 3100 Ricketts Point Road, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5400, USA.

出版信息

Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008 Sep 1;231(2):157-64. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Apr 22.

Abstract

A structure-activity analysis was used to evaluate the variation in oxime efficacy of 2-PAM, obidoxime, HI-6 and ICD585 against nerve agents. In vivo oxime protection and in vitro oxime reactivation were used as indicators of oxime efficacy against VX, sarin, VR and cyclosarin. Analysis of in vivo oxime protection was conducted with oxime protective ratios (PR) from guinea pigs receiving oxime and atropine therapy after sc administration of nerve agent. Analysis of in vitro reactivation was conducted with second-order rate contants (k(r2)) for oxime reactivation of agent-inhibited acetylcholinesterase (AChE) from guinea pig erythrocytes. In vivo oxime PR and in vitro k(r2) decreased as the volume of the alkylmethylphosphonate moiety of nerve agents increased from VX to cyclosarin. This effect was greater with 2-PAM and obidoxime (>14-fold decrease in PR) than with HI-6 and ICD585 (<3.7-fold decrease in PR). The decrease in oxime PR and k(r2) as the volume of the agent moiety conjugated to AChE increased was consistent with a steric hindrance mechanism. Linear regression of log (PR-1) against log (k(r2)[oxime dose]) produced two offset parallel regression lines that delineated a significant difference between the coupling of oxime reactivation and oxime protection for HI-6 and ICD585 compared to 2-PAM and obidoxime. HI-6 and ICD585 appeared to be 6.8-fold more effective than 2-PAM and obidoxime at coupling oxime reactivation to oxime protection, which suggested that the isonicotinamide group that is common to both of these oximes, but absent from 2-PAM and obidoxime, is important for oxime efficacy.

摘要

采用结构活性分析方法评估了2-吡啶甲醛肟(2-PAM)、双复磷、HI-6和ICD585对神经毒剂的肟类药物疗效差异。体内肟类药物保护作用和体外肟类药物重活化作用被用作肟类药物对VX、沙林、VR和环沙林疗效的指标。通过给予神经毒剂皮下注射后接受肟类药物和阿托品治疗的豚鼠的肟类药物保护率(PR)进行体内肟类药物保护作用分析。通过豚鼠红细胞中被毒剂抑制的乙酰胆碱酯酶(AChE)的肟类药物重活化二级速率常数(k(r2))进行体外重活化分析。随着神经毒剂的烷基甲基膦酸酯部分体积从VX增加到环沙林,体内肟类药物PR和体外k(r2)均降低。2-PAM和双复磷的这种效应更大(PR降低超过14倍),而HI-6和ICD585的效应较小(PR降低<3.7倍)。随着与AChE结合的毒剂部分体积增加,肟类药物PR和k(r2)降低,这与空间位阻机制一致。log(PR-1)对log(k(r2)[肟类药物剂量])的线性回归产生了两条偏移的平行回归线,这表明与2-PAM和双复磷相比,HI-6和ICD585在肟类药物重活化与肟类药物保护的偶联方面存在显著差异。HI-6和ICD585在将肟类药物重活化与肟类药物保护偶联方面似乎比2-PAM和双复磷有效6.8倍,这表明这两种肟类药物共有的异烟酰胺基团(2-PAM和双复磷中不存在)对肟类药物疗效很重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验