• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

方差分析中的同时因子选择与水平合并

Simultaneous factor selection and collapsing levels in ANOVA.

作者信息

Bondell Howard D, Reich Brian J

机构信息

Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-8203, USA.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2009 Mar;65(1):169-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01061.x. Epub 2008 May 28.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01061.x
PMID:18510652
Abstract

When performing an analysis of variance, the investigator often has two main goals: to determine which of the factors have a significant effect on the response, and to detect differences among the levels of the significant factors. Level comparisons are done via a post-hoc analysis based on pairwise differences. This article proposes a novel constrained regression approach to simultaneously accomplish both goals via shrinkage within a single automated procedure. The form of this shrinkage has the ability to collapse levels within a factor by setting their effects to be equal, while also achieving factor selection by zeroing out entire factors. Using this approach also leads to the identification of a structure within each factor, as levels can be automatically collapsed to form groups. In contrast to the traditional pairwise comparison methods, these groups are necessarily nonoverlapping so that the results are interpretable in terms of distinct subsets of levels. The proposed procedure is shown to have the oracle property in that asymptotically it performs as well as if the exact structure were known beforehand. A simulation and real data examples show the strong performance of the method.

摘要

在进行方差分析时,研究者通常有两个主要目标:确定哪些因素对响应有显著影响,以及检测显著因素各水平之间的差异。水平比较是通过基于成对差异的事后分析来完成的。本文提出了一种新颖的约束回归方法,通过在单个自动化过程中进行收缩,同时实现这两个目标。这种收缩形式能够通过将一个因素内各水平的效应设为相等来合并这些水平,同时还能通过将整个因素的效应归零来实现因素选择。使用这种方法还能识别每个因素内的一种结构,因为各水平可以自动合并形成组。与传统的成对比较方法不同,这些组必然是不重叠的,这样结果就能根据不同的水平子集来解释。所提出的过程被证明具有神谕性质,即渐近地它的表现与事先知道确切结构时一样好。一个模拟和实际数据示例展示了该方法的强大性能。

相似文献

1
Simultaneous factor selection and collapsing levels in ANOVA.方差分析中的同时因子选择与水平合并
Biometrics. 2009 Mar;65(1):169-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01061.x. Epub 2008 May 28.
2
Sample size determination for constrained longitudinal data analysis.受限纵向数据分析的样本量确定
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):679-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.3507.
3
Sliced inverse regression with regularizations.带正则化的切片逆回归
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):124-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00836.x. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
4
Variable selection for clustering with Gaussian mixture models.用于高斯混合模型聚类的变量选择
Biometrics. 2009 Sep;65(3):701-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01160.x. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
5
Gaussian process functional regression modeling for batch data.用于批量数据的高斯过程函数回归建模
Biometrics. 2007 Sep;63(3):714-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00758.x.
6
Factor selection and structural identification in the interaction ANOVA model.交互作用方差分析模型中的因子选择与结构识别
Biometrics. 2013 Mar;69(1):70-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01810.x. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
7
Subset selection with additional order information.
Biometrics. 1996 Dec;52(4):1363-74.
8
Simultaneous regression shrinkage, variable selection, and supervised clustering of predictors with OSCAR.使用OSCAR进行预测变量的同时回归收缩、变量选择和监督聚类。
Biometrics. 2008 Mar;64(1):115-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00843.x. Epub 2007 Jun 30.
9
Working-correlation-structure identification in generalized estimating equations.广义估计方程中的工作相关结构识别
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):642-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.3489.
10
Q-factor analysis as a tool for phylogenetic studies of morphometric data.
Anthropol Anz. 2006 Sep;64(3):345-53.

引用本文的文献

1
Regression Trees With Fused Leaves.带融合叶的回归树
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5872-5884. doi: 10.1002/sim.10272. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
Optimizing predictive strategies for acute kidney injury after major vascular surgery.优化大血管手术后急性肾损伤的预测策略。
Surgery. 2021 Jul;170(1):298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.01.030. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
3
A penalized likelihood approach for investigating gene-drug interactions in pharmacogenetic studies.一种用于药物遗传学研究中探究基因-药物相互作用的惩罚似然法。
Biometrics. 2015 Jun;71(2):529-37. doi: 10.1111/biom.12259. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
4
Rating scales as predictors--the old question of scale level and some answers.作为预测指标的评定量表——量表水平的老问题及一些答案。
Psychometrika. 2014 Jul;79(3):357-76. doi: 10.1007/s11336-013-9343-3. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
5
Consistent Group Identification and Variable Selection in Regression with Correlated Predictors.相关预测变量回归中的一致组识别与变量选择
J Comput Graph Stat. 2013 Apr 1;22(2):319-340. doi: 10.1080/15533174.2012.707849.
6
Factor selection and structural identification in the interaction ANOVA model.交互作用方差分析模型中的因子选择与结构识别
Biometrics. 2013 Mar;69(1):70-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01810.x. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
7
Pairwise variable selection for high-dimensional model-based clustering.基于高维模型的聚类的成对变量选择。
Biometrics. 2010 Sep;66(3):793-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01341.x.
8
A comprehensive approach to haplotype-specific analysis by penalized likelihood.基于惩罚似然的单体型特异性分析的综合方法。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2010 Jan;18(1):95-103. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.118.