• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哈特曼氏回纳术后的并发症发生率:开放手术与腹腔镜手术入路对比

Complication rates after Hartmann's reversal: open vs. laparoscopic approach.

作者信息

Haughn Christopher, Ju Brian, Uchal Miro, Arnaud Jean Pierre, Reed James F, Bergamaschi Roberto

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug;51(8):1232-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9264-x. Epub 2008 May 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10350-008-9264-x
PMID:18512101
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was performed to compare open Hartmann's reversal to laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal with regard to complication, readmission, and reoperation rates.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent open Hartmann's reversal or laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal between 1998 and 2004 at two institutions were collected. End points were complications in the hospital or after discharge, readmission to the hospital, and reoperation within 6 months after initial surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-one open Hartmann's reversal and 61 laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal patients were well matched except for American Society of Anesthesiology grade (1.9 vs. 1.6; P = 0.008), timing of Hartmann's procedure (14 vs. 6 months; P = 0.001), operation time (210 vs. 154 minutes; P = 0.001), and estimated blood loss (363 vs. 254 ml; P = 0.01). Thirty-day complication rates did not differ (18 vs. 13 percent). At 6 month follow-up, open Hartmann's reversal patients had increased complication (16.4 vs. 3.3 percent; P = 0.015) and reoperation (13.1 vs. 3.3 percent; P = 0.048) rates but the same readmission rates (16.4 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with open Hartmann's reversal, 6 month complication and reoperation rates were lower in laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal patients. Most of the six-month complications and reoperations in open Hartmann's reversal were abdominal wall-related. Readmission rates were similar, but reasons for readmission were surgical in open Hartmann's reversal and medical in laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较开放Hartmann回纳术与腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术在并发症、再入院率和再次手术率方面的差异。

方法

收集了1998年至2004年期间在两家机构接受开放Hartmann回纳术或腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术的患者数据。终点指标为住院期间或出院后的并发症、再次入院以及初次手术后6个月内的再次手术。

结果

61例行开放Hartmann回纳术的患者和61例行腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术的患者除了美国麻醉医师协会分级(1.9对1.6;P = 0.008)、Hartmann手术时机(14对6个月;P = 0.001)、手术时间(210对154分钟;P = 0.001)和估计失血量(363对254毫升;P = 0.01)外,其他方面匹配良好。30天并发症发生率无差异(18%对13%)。在6个月随访时,开放Hartmann回纳术患者的并发症(16.4%对3.3%;P = 0.015)和再次手术率(13.1%对3.3%;P = 0.048)升高,但再入院率相同(16.4%)。

结论

与开放Hartmann回纳术相比,腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术患者6个月时的并发症和再次手术率较低。开放Hartmann回纳术6个月时的大多数并发症和再次手术与腹壁相关。再入院率相似,但开放Hartmann回纳术的再入院原因是手术相关,而腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术是医疗相关。

相似文献

1
Complication rates after Hartmann's reversal: open vs. laparoscopic approach.哈特曼氏回纳术后的并发症发生率:开放手术与腹腔镜手术入路对比
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug;51(8):1232-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9264-x. Epub 2008 May 30.
2
Hartmann's reversal is associated with high postoperative adverse events.哈特曼氏回纳术与术后高不良事件发生率相关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Nov;48(11):2117-26. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0168-8.
3
Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal.传统与腹腔镜Hartmann手术逆转术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Dec;17(6):495-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180f61762.
4
Is laparoscopic colectomy applicable to patients with body mass index >30? A case-matched comparative study with open colectomy.腹腔镜结肠切除术适用于身体质量指数>30的患者吗?一项与开腹结肠切除术的病例匹配对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 May;48(5):975-81. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0941-0.
5
Factors influencing postoperative adverse events after Hartmann's reversal.影响 Hartmann 手术逆转术后不良事件的因素。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):369-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02629.x.
6
Feasibility and morbidity of reversal of Hartmann's.哈特曼氏手术逆转的可行性及发病率
Colorectal Dis. 2005 Sep;7(5):454-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00862.x.
7
Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a retrospective review.腹腔镜与开腹Hartmann手术逆转术:一项回顾性研究
ANZ J Surg. 2014 Dec;84(12):965-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12667. Epub 2014 May 23.
8
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.腹腔镜下哈特曼手术的逆转
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Jun;57(6):A4149.
9
Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure.哈特曼手术后腹腔镜下恢复肠道连续性
Am J Surg. 2005 Jun;189(6):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.007.
10
Retrospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann's Reversal: A Single-Institution Experience.腹腔镜与开放Hartmann回纳术的回顾性评估:单机构经验
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Oct;25(5):e156-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000201.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical Outcomes of Open and Laparoscopic Hartmann Reversal: A Single-Center Comparative Study.开放手术与腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术的手术结局:一项单中心比较研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 18;16(8):e67102. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67102. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal has better clinical outcomes compared to open surgery: An international multicenter cohort study involving 502 patients.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜Hartmann逆转术具有更好的临床效果:一项涉及502例患者的国际多中心队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 1;5(5):e788. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.788. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis.
腹腔镜是否是Hartmann 复位术的可靠剖腹手术替代方法?一项更新的荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Apr;26(4):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02560-2. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann Reversal: A Case-Control Study.腹腔镜与开放Hartmann回纳术:一项病例对照研究。
Surg Res Pract. 2021 Jan 23;2021:4547537. doi: 10.1155/2021/4547537. eCollection 2021.
5
Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal: Application of a Single-Port Approach Through the Colostomy Site.腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术:经结肠造口部位单孔入路的应用
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Feb;37(1):29-34. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.21. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
6
Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Hartmann Takedown: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.传统与微创哈特曼手术还纳术的比较:文献的荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1820-1828. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04962-8.
7
Comparison between laparoscopic and open Hartmann's reversal: results of a decade-long multicenter retrospective study.腹腔镜与开腹 Hartmann 术式回肠造口还纳术的比较:一项长达十年的多中心回顾性研究结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4780-4787. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6227-8. Epub 2018 May 15.
8
Transanal Hartmann's colostomy reversal assisted by laparoscopy: outcomes of the first 10 patients.经腹腔镜辅助经肛 Hartmann 结肠造口还纳术:10 例患者的初步结果。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):4981-4987. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5462-8. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
9
Reversal of the Hartmann's procedure: A comparative study of laparoscopic versus open surgery.哈特曼手术的逆转:腹腔镜手术与开放手术的对比研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2017 Jan-Mar;13(1):47-50. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181329.
10
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure: is it safe and feasible?腹腔镜下哈特曼手术逆转术:是否安全可行?
Updates Surg. 2016 Mar;68(1):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0363-2. Epub 2016 Apr 13.