• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统与腹腔镜Hartmann手术逆转术的比较

Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal.

作者信息

Faure Jean Pierre, Doucet Carole, Essique David, Badra Youssef, Carretier Michel, Richer Jean Pierre, Scépi Michel

机构信息

Service Chirurgie Viscérale Digestive et Endocrinienne, Centre de Don de Corps, Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie, Université de Poitiers, 6 rue de la Miletrie, BP 199, 86034 Poitiers cedex, France.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Dec;17(6):495-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180f61762.

DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180f61762
PMID:18097307
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compares open Hartmann's procedure reversal (OHPR) and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal (LHPR) in patients first treated for peritonitis (Henchey III or IV).

METHODS

Fourteen patients who underwent LHPR during a 2-year period were compared with 20 patients who had previously undergone an open procedure at the same institution.

RESULTS

Conversion rate was 14.28%. Operating time was shorter for the laparoscopic group [143 (90 to 240) vs. 180 (90 to 350) min, P<0.05]. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group [9.5 (4 to 18) vs. 11 (6 to 39)]. Use of patient-controlled analgesia was not significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group [3 (0 to 4) vs. 3.5 (0 to 8)]. Morbidities observed in the LHPR group include a parietal abscess and an anastomotic stenosis without surgical treatment. The OHPR group had 6 complications: 1 anastomotic leak and 5 incisional hernias.

CONCLUSIONS

LHPR with a conversion rate of 14.28% seems to be a method with shorter operating time and less morbidity compared with OHPR.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了初次治疗腹膜炎(亨奇 III 或 IV 级)患者的开放式哈特曼手术逆转术(OHPR)和腹腔镜哈特曼手术逆转术(LHPR)。

方法

将 2 年内接受 LHPR 的 14 例患者与同一机构先前接受开放式手术的 20 例患者进行比较。

结果

中转率为 14.28%。腹腔镜组的手术时间较短[143(90 至 240)分钟 vs. 180(90 至 350)分钟,P<0.05]。腹腔镜组的住院时间较短[9.5(4 至 18)天 vs. 11(6 至 39)天]。腹腔镜组患者自控镇痛的使用时间无显著缩短[3(0 至 4)天 vs. 3.5(0 至 8)天]。LHPR 组观察到的并发症包括 1 例壁层脓肿和 1 例无需手术治疗的吻合口狭窄。OHPR 组有 6 例并发症:1 例吻合口漏和 5 例切口疝。

结论

与 OHPR 相比,中转率为 14.28%的 LHPR 似乎是一种手术时间较短且发病率较低的方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal.传统与腹腔镜Hartmann手术逆转术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007 Dec;17(6):495-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180f61762.
2
Complication rates after Hartmann's reversal: open vs. laparoscopic approach.哈特曼氏回纳术后的并发症发生率:开放手术与腹腔镜手术入路对比
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Aug;51(8):1232-6. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9264-x. Epub 2008 May 30.
3
Laparoscopic versus open reversal of Hartmann's procedure: a retrospective review.腹腔镜与开腹Hartmann手术逆转术:一项回顾性研究
ANZ J Surg. 2014 Dec;84(12):965-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12667. Epub 2014 May 23.
4
Laparoscopic restoration of intestinal continuity after Hartmann's procedure.哈特曼手术后腹腔镜下恢复肠道连续性
Am J Surg. 2005 Jun;189(6):670-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.03.007.
5
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's rectosigmoidectomy.腹腔镜下哈特曼直肠乙状结肠切除术的逆转术
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Jan;10(1):81-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01243.x. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
6
Hartmann's reversal is associated with high postoperative adverse events.哈特曼氏回纳术与术后高不良事件发生率相关。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Nov;48(11):2117-26. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0168-8.
7
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure: technique and results.腹腔镜下哈特曼手术的逆转:技术与结果
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Feb;18(1):24-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31815b3233.
8
Laparoscopically assisted Hartman's reversal is an efficacious and efficient procedure: a case control study.腹腔镜辅助Hartman回纳术是一种有效且高效的手术:一项病例对照研究。
Minerva Chir. 2009 Feb;64(1):1-8.
9
Total laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.哈特曼手术的全腹腔镜逆转术。
Am Surg. 2013 Jan;79(1):67-71.
10
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.腹腔镜下哈特曼手术的逆转
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Jun;57(6):A4149.

引用本文的文献

1
Is laparoscopy a reliable alternative to laparotomy in Hartmann's reversal? An updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜是否是Hartmann 复位术的可靠剖腹手术替代方法?一项更新的荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Apr;26(4):239-252. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02560-2. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
2
Laparoscopic Hartmann's Reversal: Application of a Single-Port Approach Through the Colostomy Site.腹腔镜Hartmann回纳术:经结肠造口部位单孔入路的应用
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Feb;37(1):29-34. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.21. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
3
Conventional Versus Minimally Invasive Hartmann Takedown: A Meta-analysis of the Literature.
传统与微创哈特曼手术还纳术的比较:文献的荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2019 Jul;43(7):1820-1828. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-04962-8.
4
COLOSTOMY CLOSURE: RISK FACTORS FOR COMPLICATIONS.结肠造口关闭术:并发症的风险因素
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2017 Oct-Dec;30(4):231-234. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720201700040001.
5
Reversal of Hartmann's procedure: still a complicated operation.Hartmann 手术的逆转:仍然是一个复杂的手术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Feb;22(2):81-87. doi: 10.1007/s10151-017-1735-4. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
6
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann procedure: is it safe and feasible?腹腔镜下哈特曼手术逆转术:是否安全可行?
Updates Surg. 2016 Mar;68(1):105-10. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0363-2. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
7
Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann's reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放Hartmann回纳术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Dec;30(12):1603-15. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2325-4. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
8
Reversal of Hartmann's procedure utilizing single-port laparoscopy: an attractive alternative to laparotomy.利用单孔腹腔镜技术行哈特曼手术的逆转:开腹手术的一种有吸引力的替代方案。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1894-901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4407-3. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
9
Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure.腹腔镜下哈特曼手术的逆转
Updates Surg. 2014 Dec;66(4):277-81. doi: 10.1007/s13304-014-0268-x. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
10
Laparoscopic Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure: State of the Art 20 Years after the First Reported Case.腹腔镜哈特曼手术的逆转:首例报道 20 年后的现状。
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:530140. doi: 10.1155/2014/530140. Epub 2014 Aug 21.