Kaiser Stefan, Walther Stephan, Nennig Ernst, Kronmüller Klaus, Mundt Christoph, Weisbrod Matthias, Stippich Christoph, Vogeley Kai
Department of General Adult Psychiatry, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Aug;46(10):2524-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.013. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
In the context of the present study spatial perspective taking refers to the ability to translocate one's own egocentric viewpoint to somebody else's viewpoint in space. We adopted a spatial perspective taking paradigm and performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging study to assess gender differences of neural activity during perspective taking. 24 healthy subjects (12 male/12 female) were asked to systematically either take their own (first-person-perspective, 1PP) or another person's perspective (third-person-perspective, 3PP). Presented stimuli consisted of a virtual scenery with an avatar and red balls around him that had to be counted, if visible, from 1PP or 3PP. Reaction time was increased and correctness scores were decreased during the cognitively more effortful 3PP condition. Correctness scores showed a trend towards a more pronounced decline of performance during 3PP as compared to 1PP in female subjects. Female subjects correctness scores declined by 6.7% from 1PP to 3PP, while in male subjects this performance decline was only 2.7%. Debriefings after the experiment, reaction times depending on angle of rotation and error rates suggest that males are more likely to employ an object-based strategy in contrast to a consistently employed egocentric perspective transformation in females. In the whole group, neural activity was increased in the parieto-occipital, right inferior frontal and supplementary motor areas, confirming previous studies. With respect to gender, male subjects showed stronger activation in the precuneus and the right inferior frontal gyrus than female subjects in a region-of-interest approach. In a subgroup of male subjects whose strategy reports suggest object-based strategies these differences seem to be more pronounced. In conclusion, the differential recruitment of brain regions most likely reflects different strategies in solving this spatial perspective taking task.
在本研究的背景下,空间视角采择是指将自己以自我为中心的视角转换到他人在空间中的视角的能力。我们采用了空间视角采择范式,并进行了一项功能磁共振成像研究,以评估视角采择过程中神经活动的性别差异。24名健康受试者(12名男性/12名女性)被要求系统地采用自己的视角(第一人称视角,1PP)或他人的视角(第三人称视角,3PP)。呈现的刺激由一个虚拟场景组成,场景中有一个虚拟角色和围绕在他周围的红色球,如果从1PP或3PP视角可见,则需要对这些球进行计数。在认知要求更高的3PP条件下,反应时间增加,正确率得分降低。与1PP相比,女性受试者在3PP条件下正确率得分有更明显下降的趋势。女性受试者的正确率得分从1PP到3PP下降了6.7%,而男性受试者的这种表现下降仅为2.7%。实验后的汇报、取决于旋转角度的反应时间和错误率表明,与女性始终采用的以自我为中心的视角转换不同,男性更有可能采用基于物体的策略。在整个组中,顶枕叶、右侧额下回和辅助运动区的神经活动增加,这证实了先前的研究。在感兴趣区域分析中,男性受试者在楔前叶和右侧额下回的激活比女性受试者更强。在一组策略报告表明采用基于物体策略的男性受试者中,这些差异似乎更为明显。总之,大脑区域的不同激活很可能反映了解决这一空间视角采择任务的不同策略。