Cho Taehong
Department of English Language and Literature, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Phonetica. 2008;65(1-2):45-61. doi: 10.1159/000130015. Epub 2008 May 28.
This study investigates how prosodic strengthening is kinematically manifested in V-to-V lingual movement in English CV#CV context (where # is a prosodic boundary). Results showed that both boundary and accent gave rise to a kind of prosodic strengthening (showing spatial and temporal expansion), but exact kinematic patterns of prosodic strengthening were different as a function of the type of gesture (tongue lowering versus raising) associated with different vowels (/i/to-/ alpha/ vs. /alpha/-to-/i/) and the source of prosodic strengthening (boundary versus accentuation). This implies that speakers must know about prosodic structure and differentiate the two sources of prosodic strengthening in a systematic fine-grained fashion. From a theoretical point of view regarding a mass-spring gestural model, results suggested that kinematic patterns of prosodic strengthening could not be fully accounted for by any particular dynamical parameter, presenting a complex nature of prosodic strengthening. The results also implied that the theory of the pi-gesture (the prosodic boundary gesture) under the rubric of the mass-spring gestural model needs to be refined in terms of how the theory defines the exact scope of the pi-gesture's influence in the temporal dimension and how it differentiates boundary-induced articulation from an accent-induced one.
本研究调查了在英语CV#CV语境(其中#为韵律边界)中,韵律强化在V到V的舌部运动中是如何通过运动学表现出来的。结果表明,边界和重音都会引起一种韵律强化(表现为空间和时间上的扩展),但韵律强化的确切运动学模式会因与不同元音(/i/到/α/与/α/到/i/)相关的手势类型(舌部降低与升高)以及韵律强化的来源(边界与重音)而有所不同。这意味着说话者必须了解韵律结构,并以系统的细粒度方式区分韵律强化的两种来源。从关于质量-弹簧手势模型的理论角度来看,结果表明韵律强化的运动学模式无法由任何特定的动力学参数完全解释,这体现了韵律强化的复杂性。结果还暗示,在质量-弹簧手势模型框架下的π-手势(韵律边界手势)理论,需要在该理论如何定义π-手势在时间维度上的确切影响范围以及如何区分边界诱导的发音和重音诱导的发音方面进行完善。