Suppr超能文献

比较消退和替代行为的差别强化的主要和附带效果。

Comparing main and collateral effects of extinction and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.

作者信息

Petscher Erin Seligson, Bailey Jon S

机构信息

Florida State University, USA.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 2008 Jul;32(4):468-88. doi: 10.1177/0145445507309032.

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects and collateral effects of extinction (EXT) and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA) interventions with inappropriate vocalizations and work refusal. Both interventions have been used frequently to reduce problem behaviors. The benefits of these interventions have been established yet may be outweighed by the reported negative side effects that result. However, these collateral effects have rarely been measured or reported. DRA produced the most rapid reductions in behavior for 4 of the 5 participants. Other behaviors were measured for changes and showed that the desirable collateral effect of academic engagement tended to be higher during EXT than DRA. No evidence of EXT bursts was present with any participant, although EXT-induced aggression occurred with 1 participant.

摘要

本研究评估了消退(EXT)和替代行为的差别强化(DRA)干预措施对不适当发声和拒绝工作的影响及附带影响。这两种干预措施都经常被用于减少问题行为。这些干预措施的益处已得到证实,但据报道其产生的负面副作用可能会超过益处。然而,这些附带影响很少被测量或报告。在5名参与者中,有4名参与者的行为通过DRA得到了最快的减少。还对其他行为的变化进行了测量,结果显示,与DRA相比,EXT期间学术参与的理想附带影响往往更高。尽管有1名参与者出现了EXT诱发的攻击行为,但没有任何参与者出现EXT爆发的迹象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验