Holland C, O'Connor P, Taylor M R, Hughes G, Girdwood R W, Smith H
Department of Paediatrics, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Scand J Infect Dis. 1991;23(2):225-31. doi: 10.3109/00365549109023405.
Toxocara canis antibody titres were measured in members of 30 families. 73/140 (52.1%) family members were seropositive for T. canis at a dilution greater than or equal to 1:50 and 11 (7.8%) had reciprocal titres greater than or equal to 800. Toxocara ova were sought (a) in relation to the 30 families and (b) in the community. No toxocara ova were found in household dust samples. 38% of family gardens contained toxocara ova while 6% of soil samples from public parks and open spaces around housing estates were positive. None of the faecal specimens from pet dogs were positive for toxocara ova as compared to 6.2% of stray dogs. 5.3% of canine faecal samples from the streets contained toxocara ova. In this study household garden soil was a potentially greater source of toxocara infection than soil in public parks and open spaces.
对30个家庭的成员检测了犬弓首蛔虫抗体滴度。140名家庭成员中有73人(52.1%)在稀释度大于或等于1:50时犬弓首蛔虫血清呈阳性,11人(7.8%)的抗体滴度倒数大于或等于800。分别在(a)30个家庭和(b)社区中查找犬弓首蛔虫卵。在家用灰尘样本中未发现犬弓首蛔虫卵。38%的家庭花园含有犬弓首蛔虫卵,而来自公共公园和居民区周围开放空间的土壤样本中有6%呈阳性。与6.2%的流浪狗相比,宠物狗的粪便样本中没有一个犬弓首蛔虫卵呈阳性。街道上5.3%的犬类粪便样本含有犬弓首蛔虫卵。在本研究中,家庭花园土壤比公共公园和开放空间的土壤更有可能是犬弓首蛔虫感染的来源。