O'Boyle Noel M, Brewerton Suzanne C, Taylor Robin
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge, UK.
J Chem Inf Model. 2008 Jun;48(6):1269-78. doi: 10.1021/ci8000452. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
A continuing problem in protein-ligand docking is the correct relative ranking of active molecules versus inactives. Using the ChemScore scoring function as implemented in the GOLD docking software, we have investigated the effect of scaling hydrogen bond, metal-ligand, and lipophilic interactions based on the buriedness of the interaction. Buriedness was measured using the receptor density, the number of protein heavy atoms within 8.0 A. Terms in the scaling functions were optimized using negative data, represented by docked poses of inactive molecules. The objective function was the mean rank of the scores of the active poses in the Astex Diverse Set (Hartshorn et al. J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50, 726) with respect to the docked poses of 99 inactives. The final four-parameter model gave a substantial improvement in the average rank from 18.6 to 12.5. Similar results were obtained for an independent test set. Receptor density scaling is available as an option in the recent GOLD release.
蛋白质-配体对接中一个持续存在的问题是活性分子与非活性分子的正确相对排序。使用GOLD对接软件中实现的ChemScore评分函数,我们基于相互作用的埋藏程度研究了缩放氢键、金属-配体和脂溶性相互作用的影响。埋藏程度通过受体密度来衡量,即8.0 Å范围内蛋白质重原子的数量。缩放函数中的项使用阴性数据进行优化,阴性数据由非活性分子的对接构象表示。目标函数是阿斯利康多样化数据集(Hartshorn等人,《药物化学杂志》,2007年,50卷,726页)中活性构象相对于99个非活性分子对接构象的分数平均排名。最终的四参数模型使平均排名从18.6大幅提高到12.5。对于一个独立测试集也获得了类似的结果。受体密度缩放作为最近GOLD版本中的一个选项可用。