Bannister Sharon R, Powell Charles A
U.S. Air Force Periodontics Residency, Periodontics Flight, 59th Dental Training Squadron, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland Air Force Base, TX, USA.
J Periodontol. 2008 Jun;79(6):1116-20. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.060475.
Guided bone regeneration is frequently performed to augment deficient alveolar ridges. Although many materials may be used for these procedures, the outcome is usually predictable. In this report, we present an unusual reaction to a frequently used commercially available xenograft material.
A 36-year-old African American male was referred for restoration of edentulous space #8. Examination confirmed a ridge inadequate for implant placement without augmentation. A staged approach was chosen, with augmentation by a mixture of autogenous bone and anorganic bovine bone with platelet-rich plasma and a bioabsorbable collagen membrane. Healing was uneventful, although after 4 months, upon flap reflection, no regenerated hard tissue was found. The tissue at the site was submitted for histology, and the site was regrafted with an allograft/xenograft mixture and covered by a bioabsorbable collagen membrane. Wound healing was uneventful, and a histologic core was obtained at implant placement 5 months later.
The initial histologic specimen consisted of a fibrous connective tissue matrix supporting islands of the anorganic bovine bone. The majority of the graft material demonstrated an intimate association with multinucleated foreign body-type giant cells. The histologic core obtained at the second procedure consisted of trabeculae of viable lamellar bone and associated fibrous connective tissue without a significant inflammatory cell infiltrate. Scattered particles of anorganic bovine bone were present, but no foreign body-type giant cells were identified.
Failure of commonly used materials for guided bone regeneration is rare; however, different batches of materials may elicit varying immune responses in the recipient.
引导骨再生术常用于牙槽嵴增量。尽管许多材料可用于这些手术,但其结果通常是可预测的。在本报告中,我们展示了对一种常用的市售异种移植材料的异常反应。
一名36岁的非裔美国男性因修复8号牙缺失间隙前来就诊。检查证实牙槽嵴不足,不进行增量则无法植入种植体。选择了分期治疗方法,使用自体骨和无机牛骨的混合物,并添加富血小板血浆和生物可吸收胶原膜进行增量。愈合过程顺利,然而4个月后,翻开瓣时未发现再生的硬组织。将该部位的组织送去做组织学检查,并用同种异体移植/异种移植混合物重新移植该部位,并用生物可吸收胶原膜覆盖。伤口愈合顺利,5个月后植入种植体时获取了组织学核心样本。
最初的组织学标本由支持无机牛骨岛的纤维结缔组织基质组成。大部分移植材料显示与多核异物型巨细胞密切相关。第二次手术获取的组织学核心样本由存活的板层骨小梁和相关的纤维结缔组织组成,无明显炎性细胞浸润。存在散在的无机牛骨颗粒,但未发现异物型巨细胞。
引导骨再生常用材料的失败情况很少见;然而,不同批次的材料可能在受者体内引发不同的免疫反应。