Kummervold Per Egil, Holthe Halgeir
Norwegian Centre for Telemedicine, University Hospital of North Norway,N-9038 Tromsø, Norway.
J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(4):186-9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.070818.
We investigated how short messages communicating health information would best be distributed to people with vision difficulties using mobile phones. Twelve visually-impaired persons who were unable to read short message service (SMS) messages directly compared three methods of presenting text messages as speech: (1) ordinary SMS messages were sent to the users and converted into speech by the mobile phone; (2) multimedia messages were sent to the users with prerecorded speech-synthesized information; and (3) mobile phone calls were placed to the users and prerecorded speech-synthesized messages were streamed to them. The latter two approaches used server-generated sound files. Over a three-month trial period, we sent a total of 88 SMS messages to the subjects, 111 multimedia messaging service (MMS) messages and 104 telephone calls. All of the SMS messages, 88% of the MMS messages and 69% of the telephone calls were received. In subsequent interviews, we asked the users which presentation method they preferred. SMS scored significantly better than both MMS (P = 0.033) and telephones (P = 0.006). All three methods had serious drawbacks. However, the study suggests that it might be possible to develop suitable technology for communicating with people with vision difficulties by mobile phone.
我们研究了如何利用手机将传达健康信息的短信以最佳方式分发给视力有障碍的人群。12名无法直接读取短信服务(SMS)信息的视障人士对三种将文本信息呈现为语音的方法进行了比较:(1)将普通短信发送给用户,由手机转换为语音;(2)向用户发送带有预先录制的语音合成信息的多媒体信息;(3)给用户打电话,并向他们传输预先录制的语音合成信息。后两种方法使用的是服务器生成的声音文件。在为期三个月的试验期内,我们共向受试者发送了88条短信、111条多媒体信息服务(MMS)信息和104个电话。所有短信、88%的MMS信息和69%的电话被接收。在随后的访谈中,我们询问用户他们更喜欢哪种呈现方式。短信的得分明显高于MMS(P = 0.033)和电话(P = 0.006)。这三种方法都有严重的缺点。然而,该研究表明,开发适合通过手机与视力有障碍的人进行交流的技术或许是可行的。