Reiter R C, Shakerin L R, Gambone J C, Milburn A K
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jul;165(1):104-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(91)90235-j.
After a comprehensive clinical and psychological evaluation, 99 women with pelvic pain of at least 6 months' duration and normal findings at laparoscopy were divided into two groups, including 47 women with probable somatic causes of pain (group 1) and 52 women without identifiable somatic abnormality (group 2). Women without identifiable somatic abnormality (group 2) were younger, had higher mean somatization scores, and reported an earlier mean age at first intercourse, a higher number of total sexual partners, and a higher prevalence of sexual abuse before the age of 20. Within group 2 (nonsomatic pain) but not within group 1, mean somatization scores were significantly higher among women with a history of sexual abuse than among women with a negative history. When analyzed as risks for nonsomatic pelvic pain, the positive predictive value of both a history of sexual abuse and a high somatization score was 78% (relative risk compared with that of women with zero or one risk factor, 2.1; p less than 0.0001). These data suggest that the psychosocial profile of women with nonsomatic pelvic pain differs from that of women with somatic pelvic pain and that previous sexual abuse is a significant predisposing risk for somatization and non-somatic chronic pelvic pain.
经过全面的临床和心理评估,99名患有至少6个月持续性盆腔疼痛且腹腔镜检查结果正常的女性被分为两组,其中47名女性疼痛可能由躯体原因引起(第1组),52名女性未发现可识别的躯体异常(第2组)。未发现可识别躯体异常的女性(第2组)更年轻,平均躯体化得分更高,首次性交的平均年龄更早,性伴侣总数更多,20岁前遭受性虐待的患病率更高。在第2组(非躯体性疼痛)而非第1组中,有性虐待史的女性平均躯体化得分显著高于无此病史的女性。当将性虐待史和高躯体化得分作为非躯体性盆腔疼痛的风险因素进行分析时,其阳性预测值均为78%(与零或一个风险因素的女性相比,相对风险为2.1;p<0.0001)。这些数据表明,非躯体性盆腔疼痛女性的心理社会特征与躯体性盆腔疼痛女性不同,既往性虐待是躯体化和非躯体性慢性盆腔疼痛的重要诱发风险因素。