Ehlert U, Heim C, Hellhammer D H
Center of Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Germany.
Psychother Psychosom. 1999 Mar-Apr;68(2):87-94. doi: 10.1159/000012318.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether psychiatric disturbances, particularly somatization, and an increased number of traumatic and critical life events, which have been found in women with idiopathic chronic pelvic pain (ICPP), can also be observed in women with chronic pelvic pain and abdominal adhesions (ACPP).
Forty women who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy were subdivided into three groups according to blind rated somatic pathologies: ICPP patients (n = 16), ACPP patients (n = 10), infertile controls without pain (n = 14). Besides the standardized assessment of DSM-III-R diagnosis, questionnaires and semistandardized interviews were used to estimate depression, somatization, pain, the prevalence of sexual and physical abuse, and the number of critical life events.
Diagnostic criteria for somatoform pain disorder were fullfilled in 73.3% of the ICPP patients, 60% of the ACPP patients and none of the controls. With respect to the somatization symptom checklist the two pain groups scored significantly higher than the controls (p < 0.05). Referring to perceived pain, ACPP patients differed from the ICPP patients by one out of seven subscales (higher persistence of pain; p < 0.05). No correlation was found between the intensity of pain and the severity of classified adhesions. The two groups of pain patients significantly differed from controls by a higher prevalence of sexual abuse (p < 0.05). Depression was found neither in the pain groups nor in the controls.
Because high somatization and high prevalence rates of abuse were not only found in patients suffering from ICPP but also in ACPP patients, it seems to be doubtful that the somatic pathology may fully explain the psychopathology in patients with ACPP.
本研究旨在确定在特发性慢性盆腔疼痛(ICPP)女性中发现的精神障碍,尤其是躯体化,以及创伤性和重大生活事件数量的增加,是否也能在患有慢性盆腔疼痛和腹部粘连(ACPP)的女性中观察到。
40名接受诊断性腹腔镜检查的女性根据盲法评定的躯体病理情况被分为三组:ICPP患者(n = 16)、ACPP患者(n = 10)、无痛的不孕对照者(n = 14)。除了对DSM-III-R诊断进行标准化评估外,还使用问卷和半标准化访谈来评估抑郁、躯体化、疼痛、性虐待和身体虐待的患病率以及重大生活事件的数量。
73.3%的ICPP患者、60%的ACPP患者符合躯体形式疼痛障碍的诊断标准,而对照组无一符合。在躯体化症状清单方面,两个疼痛组的得分显著高于对照组(p < 0.05)。在感知疼痛方面,ACPP患者与ICPP患者在七个分量表中的一个存在差异(疼痛持续时间更长;p < 0.05)。未发现疼痛强度与分类粘连的严重程度之间存在相关性。两组疼痛患者与对照组相比,性虐待的患病率更高(p < 0.05)。疼痛组和对照组均未发现抑郁情况。
由于不仅在ICPP患者中发现了高躯体化和高虐待患病率,在ACPP患者中也有发现,因此躯体病理是否能完全解释ACPP患者的精神病理情况似乎值得怀疑。