• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

储存方法对组织调理剂表面粗糙度的影响。

Influence of storage methods on the surface roughness of tissue conditioners.

作者信息

Hong Guan, Li YingAi, Maeda Takeshi, Mizumachi Wataru, Sadamori Shinsuke, Hamada Taizo, Murata Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8553, Japan.

出版信息

Dent Mater J. 2008 Mar;27(2):153-8. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.153.

DOI:10.4012/dmj.27.153
PMID:18540387
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of three kinds of storage methods on surface roughness of tissue conditioners. Four commercial tissue conditioners (GC Soft Liner, Softone, Fictioner, and Hydro-Cast) were used in this study. Five samples of each material were stored in distilled water, air, and a denture cleanser (Polident). Mean surface roughness (R(a)) values of dental stone casts made from the tissue conditioners were measured after 0, 1, 3, 7, and 14 days of immersion using a profilometer. Significant differences in the R(a) values of the specimens were found among the three storage methods. The values of R(a) significantly increased with increase in immersion time for each storage method, except for the materials stored in air. It was found that the materials stored in air showed the most stable and lowest values of R(a). Results obtained suggested that a tissue conditioner exhibited smooth and minimal change in surface roughness with time when stored in air than in distilled water and denture cleanser.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较三种储存方法对组织调理剂表面粗糙度的影响。本研究使用了四种商用组织调理剂(GC Soft Liner、Softone、Fictioner和Hydro-Cast)。每种材料的五个样本分别储存在蒸馏水、空气和假牙清洁剂(Polident)中。使用轮廓仪在浸泡0、1、3、7和14天后测量由组织调理剂制成的牙科石膏模型的平均表面粗糙度(R(a))值。在三种储存方法之间发现标本的R(a)值存在显著差异。除了储存在空气中的材料外,每种储存方法的R(a)值均随浸泡时间的增加而显著增加。结果发现,储存在空气中的材料显示出最稳定且最低的R(a)值。所得结果表明组织调理剂在空气中储存时比在蒸馏水和假牙清洁剂中储存时表面粗糙度随时间变化更平滑且变化最小。

相似文献

1
Influence of storage methods on the surface roughness of tissue conditioners.储存方法对组织调理剂表面粗糙度的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2008 Mar;27(2):153-8. doi: 10.4012/dmj.27.153.
2
Compatibility of tissue conditioners and denture cleansers: influence on surface conditions.义齿清洁剂和义齿稳固剂的兼容性:对表面状况的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2010 Aug;29(4):446-53. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2009-135. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
3
Effect of a denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness, and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners.义齿清洁剂对两种弹性义齿衬垫的重量、表面粗糙度及拉伸粘结强度的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):489-94. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00126-4.
4
Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: effect on surface roughness.组织调理剂与牙科石膏的兼容性:对表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Mar;93(3):274-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.011.
5
Effect of sealer coating and storage methods on the surface roughness of soft liners.封闭剂涂层和储存方法对软衬材料表面粗糙度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2016 Mar;115(3):371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
6
Evaluate the Effect of Commercially Available Denture Cleansers on Surface Hardness and Roughness of Denture Liners at Various Time Intervals.评估市售假牙清洁剂在不同时间间隔对假牙衬垫表面硬度和粗糙度的影响。
Int J Biomed Sci. 2016 Dec;12(4):130-142.
7
Changes in surface roughness and colour stability of soft denture lining materials caused by denture cleansers.义齿清洁剂引起的软性义齿衬里材料表面粗糙度和颜色稳定性的变化。
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Feb;30(2):125-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01014.x.
8
Effect of denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners.义齿清洁剂对两种弹性义齿衬垫的重量、表面粗糙度及拉伸粘结强度的影响
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Sep 1;13(5):607-11.
9
Effects of denture cleansers on direct soft denture lining materials.义齿清洁剂对直接软衬义齿材料的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Dec;72(6):657-62. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(94)90300-x.
10
Effect of tissue conditioners on the dynamic viscoelastic properties of a heat-polymerized denture base.组织调节剂对热聚合义齿基托动态粘弹性性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Oct;88(4):409-14. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128101.

引用本文的文献

1
"Antimicrobial properties of tissue conditioner modified with chitosan and green-synthesized silver nanoparticles: a promising approach for preventing denture stomatitis".壳聚糖和绿色合成银纳米粒子改性牙托水的抗菌性能:预防义齿性口炎的一种有前途的方法
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jan 31;24(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-03880-z.
2
Clinical evaluation of complete denture fabricated using two different final impression techniques on masticatory efficiency and oral health-related quality of life.两种不同最终印模技术制取全口义齿对咀嚼效率及口腔健康相关生活质量的临床评价。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Oct-Dec;22(4):382-388. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_39_22.
3
Tissue Conditioner Incorporating a Nano-Sized Surface Pre-Reacted Glass-Ionomer (S-PRG) Filler.
包含纳米尺寸表面预反应玻璃离子(S-PRG)填料的组织调理剂。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 4;14(21):6648. doi: 10.3390/ma14216648.
4
The Dynamic Viscoelasticity of Dental Soft Polymer Material Containing Citrate Ester-Based Plasticizers.含柠檬酸酯类增塑剂的牙科软质聚合物材料的动态粘弹性
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 11;13(22):5078. doi: 10.3390/ma13225078.
5
Antifungal activity and Shore A hardness of a tissue conditioner incorporated with terpinen-4-ol and cinnamaldehyde.含萜品烯-4-醇和肉桂醛的牙托水的抗真菌活性和肖氏 A 硬度。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jul;23(7):2837-2848. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02925-w. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
Antifungal effect of tissue conditioners containing poly(acryloyloxyethyltrimethyl ammonium chloride)-grafted chitosan on growth .含聚(丙烯酰氧基乙基三甲基氯化铵)接枝壳聚糖的组织调理剂对生长的抗真菌作用
J Dent Sci. 2018 Jun;13(2):160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.06.004. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
7
Porosity of temporary denture soft liners containing antifungal agents.含抗真菌剂的临时义齿软衬材料的孔隙率
J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 Sep-Oct;24(5):453-461. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720160092.
8
The influence of cyclic stress on surface properties of soft liners.循环应力对软衬材料表面性能的影响。
Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):214-221. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0260-7. Epub 2016 Jul 25.