Ghosh Nilanjan, Cui Qiang
Department of Chemistry and Theoretical Chemistry Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1101 University Ave, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
J Phys Chem B. 2008 Jul 17;112(28):8387-97. doi: 10.1021/jp800168z. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
A combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical (QM/MM) potential function is used in a thermodynamic integration approach to calculate the pK(a) of residue 66 in two mutants (V66E, V66D) of Staphylococal nuclease relative to solution. Despite the similarity in chemical nature and experimentally measured pK(a) of the two buried titritable residues, the behaviors of the two mutants and the computed pK(a) values vary greatly in the simulations. For Glu66, the side chain is consistently observed to spontaneously flip out from the protein interior during titration, and the overall protein structure remains stable throughout the simulations. The computed pK(a) shifts using conventional sampling techniques with multiple nanoseconds per lambda window (Set A and B) are generally close to the experimental value, therefore indicating that large-scale conformational rearrangements are not as important for V66E as suggested by the recent study of Warshel and co-worker. For Asp66, by contrast, flipping of the shorter side chain is not sufficient for getting adequate solvent stabilization of the ionized state. As a result, more complex behaviors such as partial unfolding of a nearby beta-sheet region is observed, and the computed pK(a) shift is substantially higher than the experimental value unless Asp66 is biased to adopt the similar configurations as Glu66 in the V66E simulations. Collectively, these studies suggest that the lack of electronic polarization is not expected to be the dominant source of error in microscopic pK(a) shift calculations, while the need of enhanced sampling is more compelling for predicting the pK(a) of buried residues. Furthermore, the comparison between V66E and V66D also highlights that the microscopic interpretation of similar apparent pK(a) values and effective "dielectric constants" of proteins can vary greatly in terms of the residues that make key contributions and the scale of structural/hydration response to titration, the latter of which is difficult to predict a priori. Perturbative analyses of interactions that contribute to the titration free energy point to mutants that can be used to verify the microscopic mechanisms of titration in V66E/D SNase proteins.
采用一种结合量子力学/分子力学(QM/MM)的势函数,通过热力学积分方法计算葡萄球菌核酸酶两个突变体(V66E、V66D)中66位残基相对于溶液的pK(a)。尽管两个埋藏的可滴定残基在化学性质和实验测量的pK(a)上相似,但在模拟中两个突变体的行为和计算得到的pK(a)值差异很大。对于Glu66,在滴定过程中始终观察到侧链自发地从蛋白质内部翻转出来,并且在整个模拟过程中蛋白质整体结构保持稳定。使用传统采样技术(每个λ窗口多纳秒,集合A和B)计算得到的pK(a)偏移通常接近实验值,因此表明大规模构象重排对于V66E来说并不像Warshel及其同事最近的研究所暗示的那么重要。相比之下,对于Asp66,较短侧链的翻转不足以使离子化状态得到充分的溶剂稳定化。结果,观察到更复杂的行为,如附近β折叠区域的部分展开,并且计算得到的pK(a)偏移显著高于实验值,除非在V66E模拟中Asp66被偏向采用与Glu66相似的构象。总的来说,这些研究表明,在微观pK(a)偏移计算中,电子极化的缺乏预计不是主要误差来源,而对于预测埋藏残基的pK(a),增强采样的需求更为迫切。此外,V66E和V66D之间的比较还突出表明,对于蛋白质相似的表观pK(a)值和有效“介电常数”的微观解释,在做出关键贡献的残基以及对滴定的结构/水合响应尺度方面可能有很大差异,而后者很难先验预测。对有助于滴定自由能的相互作用进行微扰分析,指出了可用于验证V66E/D SNase蛋白中滴定微观机制的突变体。