Suppr超能文献

曲马多使用对三种即时检验法及一种基于仪器的尿液丁丙诺啡免疫测定法的影响。

Effect of tramadol use on three point-of-care and one instrument-based immunoassays for urine buprenorphine.

作者信息

Shaikh Salima, Hull Mindy J, Bishop Kenneth A, Griggs David A, Long William H, Nixon Andrea L, Flood James G

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 2008 Jun;32(5):339-43. doi: 10.1093/jat/32.5.339.

Abstract

We report that use of the popular analgesic tramadol can cause false-positive urine buprenorphine results. We examined the extent of tramadol cross-reactivity in three point-of-care urine buprenorphine immunoassays (ACON, QuikStrip, and ABMC) and an instrument-based one (Cedia). We tested 29 urine samples from patients known to be taking tramadol. Ten different samples tested positive for urine buprenorphine by at least one immunoassay. Samples with positive buprenorphine screens by immunoassay were tested for total buprenorphine and total norbuprenorphine content by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS), which confirmed that seven of the 10 positive samples were false-positives. The remaining three positive immunoassay samples had insufficient quantity for LC-MS-MS testing. No false-positives were detected with the ACON (10 ng/mL calibration cutoff) or the Cedia assay (using a 20 ng/mL calibration cutoff). All four false-positive Cedia results (using a 5 ng/mL cutoff) in this study tested negative using the ACON device. Our data suggest that tramadol use can cause false-positive urine buprenorphine immunoassays, and this effect appears to be assay-dependent. Tramadol interference with the Cedia assay is clinically relevant, especially if the 5 ng/mL calibration cutoff is used.

摘要

我们报告称,常用镇痛药曲马多可导致尿液中丁丙诺啡检测结果呈假阳性。我们检测了三种即时检验尿液丁丙诺啡免疫分析法(ACON、QuikStrip和ABMC)以及一种基于仪器的分析法(Cedia)中曲马多的交叉反应程度。我们对已知正在服用曲马多的患者的29份尿液样本进行了检测。至少有一种免疫分析法显示,有10份不同的样本尿液丁丙诺啡检测呈阳性。通过免疫分析法筛查出丁丙诺啡呈阳性的样本,采用液相色谱-串联质谱法(LC-MS-MS)检测总丁丙诺啡和总去甲丁丙诺啡含量,结果证实10份阳性样本中有7份为假阳性。其余3份免疫分析法阳性样本的量不足以进行LC-MS-MS检测。使用ACON分析法(校准临界值为10 ng/mL)或Cedia分析法(校准临界值为20 ng/mL)未检测到假阳性结果。本研究中所有4份Cedia假阳性结果(临界值为5 ng/mL)使用ACON设备检测均为阴性。我们的数据表明,使用曲马多可导致尿液丁丙诺啡免疫分析法出现假阳性结果,且这种影响似乎与检测方法有关。曲马多对Cedia分析法的干扰具有临床相关性,尤其是使用5 ng/mL校准临界值时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验